CaO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2熔渣中MgO等摩尔取代CaO时的粘度和结构关系

侯勇; 张硕; 党杰; 郭嘉; 周航航; 吕学伟

doi:10.1007/s12613-024-2913-9

Turn off MathJax

图(8) / 表(3)

数据统计

计量

文章访问数: 259
HTML全文浏览量: 107
PDF下载量: 29
被引次数: 0

文章导航 > 矿物冶金与材料学报（英文） > 2025 > 二校

Yong Hou, Shuo Zhang, Jie Dang, Jia Guo, Hanghang Zhou, and Xuewei Lü, Viscosity and structure relationship with equimolar substitution of CaO with MgO in the CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ slag melts, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,(2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-024-2913-9

Cite this article as:

Yong Hou, Shuo Zhang, Jie Dang, Jia Guo, Hanghang Zhou, and Xuewei Lü, Viscosity and structure relationship with equimolar substitution of CaO with MgO in the CaO–MgO–Al2O3–SiO2 slag melts, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,(2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-024-2913-9

Citation:

PDF( 1565 KB)

引用本文 PDF XML SpringerLink

研究论文

CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂熔渣中MgO等摩尔取代CaO时的粘度和结构关系

1)
重庆大学材料科学与工程学院, 重庆 400044, 中国
2)
重庆大学钒钛冶金及新材料重庆市重点实验室, 重庆 400044, 中国

通讯作者:
侯勇 E-mail: yhou1004@cqu.edu.cn

吕学伟 E-mail: lvxuewei@163.com

文章亮点

(1) 研究了MgO等摩尔替代CaO对CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂熔渣粘度和结构的影响规律

(2) 随着MgO替代CaO，熔渣粘度先降低后增加，而聚合度呈现单调增加趋势

(3) 替代过程中非桥氧的键强变化是导致粘度出现最小值的主要因素

中文摘要

作为冶金过程中的基础渣系，CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂熔渣一直备受关注。尽管该体系的粘度在文献中已有大量报道，但仍有一些科学问题尚未澄清，特别是在高Al₂O₃体系中MgO替代CaO所引起的粘度变化。从高炉炼铁的角度来看，铁矿石中Al₂O₃含量的增加会导致炉渣中Al₂O₃含量的相应增加。目前，高炉中高铝渣系的Al₂O₃含量一般限制在16wt%–18.5wt%，无法进一步突破。因此，了解Al₂O₃含量在16wt%–18.5wt%范围内的炉渣粘度变化有助于促进高铝铁矿石的规模化应用。本文研究了MgO等摩尔替代CaO对CaO–MgO–10mol%Al₂O₃–45mol%SiO₂熔渣（Al₂O₃含量换算成质量分数为16wt%–18.5wt%）粘度和结构的影响。研究发现，随着MgO替代量从0增加到15mol%，熔渣粘度先下降，然后随着替代量的进一步增加而上升。然而，现有文献中的粘度模型无法预测这种变化趋势。在替代过程中，与每个配位硅原子相连的桥氧的平均数量呈上升趋势。此外，MgO对桥氧的弱打断能力导致非桥氧减少，从而增加了熔渣的聚合度。结构分析表明，聚合度是决定熔渣粘度总体趋势的主要因素，但不是唯一因素。键强是影响粘度的另一个重要因素。粘度最小值的出现可归因于CaO和MgO解聚[SiO₄]和[AlO₄]四面体结构时产生的非桥氧的键强的复杂演变。

关键词:

铝硅酸盐;
粘度;
结构;
光谱学

Research Article

Viscosity and structure relationship with equimolar substitution of CaO with MgO in the CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ slag melts

+ Author Affiliations

Abstract

Abstract

Currently, the Al₂O₃ content in the high-alumina slag systems within blast furnaces is generally limited to 16wt%–18.5wt%, making it challenging to overcome this limitation. Unlike most studies that concentrated on managing the MgO/Al₂O₃ ratio or basicity, this paper explored the effect of equimolar substitution of MgO for CaO on the viscosity and structure of a high-alumina CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ slag system, providing theoretical guidance and data to facilitate the application of high-alumina ores. The results revealed that the viscosity first decreased and then increased with higher MgO substitution, reaching a minimum at 15mol% MgO concentration. Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) results found that the depths of the troughs representing [SiO₄] tetrahedra, [AlO₄] tetrahedra, and Si–O–Al bending became progressively deeper with increased MgO substitution. Deconvolution of the Raman spectra showed that the average number of bridging oxygens per Si atom and the $ {X_{{{\text{Q}}^3}}}{\text{/}}{X_{{{\text{Q}}^2}}} $ ($ {X_{{{\text{Q}}^i}}} $ is the molar fraction of Qⁱ unit, and i is the number of bridging oxygens in a [SiO₄] tetrahedral unit) ratio increased from 2.30 and 1.02 to 2.52 and 2.14, respectively, indicating a progressive polymerization of the silicate structure. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) results highlighted that non-bridging oxygen content decreased from 77.97mol% to 63.41mol% with increasing MgO concentration, whereas bridging oxygen and free oxygen contents increased. Structural analysis demonstrated a gradual increase in the polymerization degree of the tetrahedral structure with the increase in MgO substitution. However, bond strength is another important factor affecting the slag viscosity. The occurrence of a viscosity minimum can be attributed to the complex evolution of bond strengths of non-bridging oxygens generated during depolymerization of the [SiO₄] and [AlO₄] tetrahedral structures by CaO and MgO.
- aluminosilicate;
- viscosity;
- structure;
- spectroscopy

FullText(HTML)

Supplements(0)

References(53)

References

[1]	K.H. Kim, S. Sukenaga, M. Tashiro, K. Kanehashi, S. Yoshida, and H. Shibata, Variation in viscosity of aluminosilicate melts with MgO/CaO molar ratio: Influence of five-fold coordinated aluminum, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 587(2022), art. No. 121600. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121600
[2]	T. Talapaneni, N. Yedla, S. Pal, and S. Sarkar, Experimental and theoretical studies on the viscosity–structure correlation for high alumina-silicate melts, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 48(2017), No. 3, p. 1450. doi: 10.1007/s11663-017-0963-3
[3]	J. Ma, G.Q. Fu, W. Li, and M.Y. Zhu, Influence of TiO₂ on the melting property and viscosity of Cr-containing high-Ti melting slag, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 27(2020), No. 3, p. 310. doi: 10.1007/s12613-019-1914-6
[4]	Y.H. Yu, W.G. Liu, and H.B. Zuo, Viscosity and desulphurisation behaviour of CaO–SiO₂–MgO–Al₂O₃–BaO–MnO slag, Ironmaking Steelmaking., 50(2023), No. 10, p. 1420. doi: 10.1080/03019233.2023.2188525
[5]	Z.H. Yan, Q. Zhao, C.Z. Han, X.H. Mei, C.J. Liu, and M.F. Jiang, Effects of iron oxide on crystallization behavior and spatial distribution of spinel in stainless steel slag, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 31(2024), No. 2, p. 292. doi: 10.1007/s12613-023-2713-7
[6]	Y. Hou, G.H. Zhang, and K.C. Chou, Mixed alkali effect in SiO₂–CaO–Al₂O₃–TiO₂–R₂O (R = Li, Na) glass ceramics, J. Alloys Compd., 856(2021), art. No. 158239. doi: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158239
[7]	R.Y. Shao, X. Liu, H. Li, and H. Zhou, Experimental study on flow properties of blast furnace slag with different alumina contents based on the image measurement method, Ceram. Int., 49(2023), No. 22, p. 34603. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.08.109
[8]	B.M. Abel, J.C. Mauro, M.M. Smedskjaer, et al., Liquidus surface of MgO–CaO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ glass-forming systems, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 363(2013), p. 39. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.12.020
[9]	S. Zhang, Y.L. Zhang, and S.W. Wu, Effects of ZnO, FeO and Fe₂O₃ on the spinel formation, microstructure and physicochemical properties of augite-based glass ceramics, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 30(2023), No. 6, p. 1207. doi: 10.1007/s12613-022-2489-1
[10]	Y.M. Gao, S.B. Wang, C. Hong, X.J. Ma, and F. Yang, Effects of basicity and MgO content on the viscosity of the SiO₂–CaO–MgO–9wt%Al₂O₃ slag system, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 21(2014), No. 4, p. 353. doi: 10.1007/s12613-014-0916-7
[11]	G.X. Qiu, D.J. Miao, X.L. Wei, C. Bai, and X.M. Li, Effect of MgO/Al₂O₃ and CaO/SiO₂ on the metallurgical properties of CaO–SiO₂–Al₂O₃–MgO–TiO₂ slag, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 585(2022), art. No. 121545. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2022.121545
[12]	P.C. Li and X.J. Ning, Effects of MgO/Al₂O₃ ratio and basicity on the viscosities of CaO–MgO–SiO₂–Al₂O₃ slags: Experiments and modeling, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 47(2016), No. 1, p. 446. doi: 10.1007/s11663-015-0470-3
[13]	N. Saito, N. Hori, K. Nakashima, and K. Mori, Viscosity of blast furnace type slags, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 34(2003), No. 5, p. 509. doi: 10.1007/s11663-003-0018-9
[14]	J.S. Machin, T.B. Yee, and D.L. Hanna, Viscosity studies of system CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂: III, 35, 45, and 50% SiO₂, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 35(1952), No. 12, p. 322. doi: 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1952.tb13057.x
[15]	H. Kim, W.H. Kim, I. Sohn, and D.J. Min, The effect of MgO on the viscosity of the CaO–SiO₂–20 wt%Al₂O₃–MgO slag system, Steel Res. Int., 81(2010), No. 4, p. 261. doi: 10.1002/srin.201000019
[16]	F. Johannsen and H. Brunion, Untersuchungen zur Viskositat von Rennschlacken, Z. Erzbergbau MetallhuttenWes., 12(1959), No. 5-6, p. 272.
[17]	U. Veit and C. Rüssel, Viscosity and liquidus temperature of quaternary glasses close to an eutectic composition in the CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ system, J. Mater. Sci., 52(2017), No. 13, p. 8280. doi: 10.1007/s10853-017-1044-3
[18]	S. Li, Z.A. Liu, L.Q. Yin, et al., The fiber spinnability and mixed alkaline effect for calcium magnesium aluminosilicate glasses, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 557(2021), art. No. 120643. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.120643
[19]	W.G. Liu, Z.G. Pang, J.S. Wang, H.B. Zuo, and Q.G. Xue, Investigation of viscosity and structure of CaO–SiO₂–MgO–Al₂O₃–BaO–B₂O₃ slag melt, Ceram. Int., 48(2022), No. 12, p. 17123. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.02.268
[20]	G.H. Zhang, K.C. Chou, and K. Mills, Modelling viscosities of CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ molten slags, ISIJ Int., 52(2012), No. 3, p. 355. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.52.355
[21]	H.Y. Tian, D.Q. Zhu, J. Pan, C.C. Yang, W.Q. Huang, and M.S. Chu, Effect mechanism of aluminum occurrence and content on the induration characteristics of iron ore pellets, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 30(2023), No. 12, p. 2334. doi: 10.1007/s12613-023-2725-3
[22]	H. Park, J.Y. Park, G.H. Kim, and I. Sohn, Effect of TiO₂ on the viscosity and slag structure in blast furnace type slags, Steel Res. Int., 83(2012), No. 2, p. 150. doi: 10.1002/srin.201100249
[23]	M. Chen, D.W. Zhang, M.Y. Kou, and B.J. Zhao, Viscosities of iron blast furnace slags, ISIJ Int., 54(2014), No. 9, p. 2025. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.54.2025
[24]	Z.M. Yan, R.G. Reddy, X.W. Lv, Z.D. Pang, and W.C. He, Structure-based viscosity model development for titania aluminosilicate slags, Ironmaking Steelmaking, 47(2020), No. 2, p. 203. doi: 10.1080/03019233.2018.1510876
[25]	Q.F. Shu, A viscosity estimation model for molten slags in Al₂O₃–CaO–MgO–SiO₂ system, Steel Res. Int., 80(2009), No. 2, p. 107.
[26]	K.C. Mills and S. Sridhar, Viscosities of ironmaking and steelmaking slags, Ironmaking Steelmaking., 26(1999), No. 4, p. 262. doi: 10.1179/030192399677121
[27]	G. Urbain, Viscosity estimation of slags, Steel Res., 58(1987), p. 111. doi: 10.1002/srin.198701513
[28]	S.S. Zhang, Z.Y. Wang, J.L. Zhang, P.M. Guo, D.W. Jiang, and R.S. Si, Effect of TiO₂ and FeO on viscosity and structure of HIsmelt titanium-containing slag, Ceram. Int., 50(2024), No. 1, p. 791. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.10.163
[29]	X. Shen, M. Chen, N. Wang, and D. Wang, Viscosity property and melt structure of CaO–MgO–SiO₂–Al₂O₃–FeO slag system, ISIJ Int., 59(2019), No. 1, p. 9. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2018-479
[30]	G.H. Kim and I. Sohn, Effect of Al₂O₃ on the viscosity and structure of calcium silicate-based melts containing Na₂O and CaF₂, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 358(2012), No. 12-13, p. 1530. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2012.04.009
[31]	Y. Hou, S. Zhang, J. Guo, H.H. Zhou, and X.W. Lv, Effect of BaO/Al₂O₃ molar ratio on the viscosity and structure of CaO–SiO₂–MgO–Al₂O₃–BaO slag, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 626(2024), art. No. 122815. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2023.122815
[32]	P. Gillet, Raman spectroscopy at high pressure and high temperature. Phase transitions and thermodynamic properties of minerals, Phys. Chem. Miner., 23(1996), No. 4, p. 263.
[33]	I. Daniel, P.F. McMillan, P. Gillet, and B.T. Poe, Raman spectroscopic study of structural changes in calcium aluminate (CaAl₂O₄) glass at high pressure and high temperature, Chem. Geol., 128(1996), No. 1-4, p. 5. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(95)00159-X
[34]	L.G. Hwa, S.L. Hwang, and L.C. Liu, Infrared and Raman spectra of calcium alumino–silicate glasses, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 238(1998), No. 3, p. 193. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3093(98)00688-7
[35]	R.F. Wang, B. Zhang, Y.D. Liang, C.J. Liu, and M.F. Jiang, Micro insight into foaming behavior of CaO–SiO₂–Fe_xO–MgO-based slag induced by slag/metal reaction, Ceram. Int., 49(2023), No. 11, p. 17185. doi: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2023.02.082
[36]	H.Y. Wang, Y. Li, S.Q. Jiao, and G.H. Zhang, Preparation of glass-ceramic by low-pressure hot-pressing sintering of CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ (–CaCl₂) glass powder, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 43(2023), No. 15, p. 7134. doi: 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2023.07.057
[37]	B.O. Mysen, D. Virgo, and C.M. Scarfe, Relations between the anionic structure and viscosity of silicate melts—A Raman spectroscopic study, Am. Mineral., 65(1980), No. 7-8, p. 690.
[38]	J.D. Frantza and B.O. Mysen, Raman spectra and structure of BaO–SiO₂, SrO–SiO₂ and CaO–SiO₂ melts to 1600°C, Chem. Geol., 121(1995), No. 1-4, p. 155. doi: 10.1016/0009-2541(94)00127-T
[39]	P. McMillan, Structural studies of silicate glasses and melts—Applications and limitations of Raman spectroscopy, Am. Mineral., 69(1984), p. 622.
[40]	T. Wu, Y.L. Zhang, F. Yuan, and Z.Q. An, Effects of the Cr₂O₃ content on the viscosity of CaO–SiO₂–10pct Al₂O₃–Cr₂O₃ quaternary slag, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 49(2018), No. 4, p. 1719. doi: 10.1007/s11663-018-1258-z
[41]	Y. Hou, G.H. Zhang, K.C. Chou, and D.Q. Fan, Mixed alkali effect in viscosity of CaO–SiO₂–Al₂O₃–R₂O melts, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 51(2020), No. 3, p. 985. doi: 10.1007/s11663-020-01830-y
[42]	J.H. Park, Structure–property relationship of CaO–MgO–SiO₂ slag: Quantitative analysis of Raman spectra, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 44(2013), No. 4, p. 938. doi: 10.1007/s11663-013-9825-9
[43]	J.H. Park and P.C.H. Rhee, Ionic properties of oxygen in slag, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 282(2001), No. 1, p. 7. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3093(01)00323-4
[44]	Y.P. Wen, Q.F. Shu, Y. Lin, and T. Fabritius, Effect of SiO₂ content and mass ratio of CaO to Al₂O₃ on the viscosity and structure of CaO–Al₂O₃–B₂O₃–SiO₂ slags, ISIJ Int., 63(2023), No. 1, p. 1. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2022-288
[45]	H. Kim and I. Sohn, Effect of CaF₂ and Li₂O additives on the viscosity of CaO–SiO₂–Na₂O slags, ISIJ Int., 51(2011), No. 1, p. 1. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.51.1
[46]	G.H. Zhang, K.C. Chou, and K. Mills, A structurally based viscosity model for oxide melts, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 45(2014), No. 2, p. 698. doi: 10.1007/s11663-013-9980-z
[47]	W.G. Liu, Y.B. Chen, J.S. Chen, J.S. Wang, and H.B. Zuo, Viscosity and structure evolution of bearing-BaO slag melt with the low CaO/SiO₂ mass ratio of 0.7, J Am Ceram Soc., 105(2022), No. 2, p. 842. doi: 10.1111/jace.18110
[48]	L. Mongalo, A.S. Lopis, and G.A. Venter, Molecular dynamics simulations of the structural properties and electrical conductivities of CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ melts, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 452(2016), p. 194. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2016.08.042
[49]	M.J. Toplis and D.B. Dingwell, Shear viscosities of CaO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ and MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ liquids: Implications for the structural role of aluminium and the degree of polymerisation of synthetic and natural aluminosilicate melts, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 68(2004), No. 24, p. 5169. doi: 10.1016/j.gca.2004.05.041
[50]	J.A. Duffy, A review of optical basicity and its applications to oxidic systems, Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 57(1993), No. 16, p. 3961. doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(93)90346-X
[51]	S.F. Zhang, X. Zhang, H.J. Peng, et al., Structure analysis of CaO–SiO₂–Al₂O₃–TiO₂ slag by molecular dynamics simulation and FT-IR spectroscopy, ISIJ Int., 54(2014), No. 4, p. 734. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.54.734
[52]	J.H. Liu, Y.W. Yu, W.G. Kong, Q. Wang, Z.J. He, and X. Yang, Effect of Al₂O₃ on the molten slag microstructure information by molecular dynamics simulation and experimental analysis, J. Non Cryst. Solids, 578(2022), art. No. 121354. doi: 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2021.121354
[53]	G.H. Zhang, K.C. Chou, and X.Y. Lv, Influences of different components on viscosities of CaO–MgO–Al₂O₃–SiO₂ melts, J. Min. Metall. Sect. B, 50(2014), No. 2, p. 157. doi: 10.2298/JMMB130819016Z