留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码
Volume 12 Issue 6
Dec.  2005
数据统计

分享

计量
  • 文章访问数:  303
  • HTML全文浏览量:  95
  • PDF下载量:  15
  • 被引次数: 0
Yong Yu and Chunyan Meng, 3-D distribution of tensile stress in rock specimens for the Brazilian test, J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing, 12(2005), No. 6, pp. 495-499.
Cite this article as:
Yong Yu and Chunyan Meng, 3-D distribution of tensile stress in rock specimens for the Brazilian test, J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing, 12(2005), No. 6, pp. 495-499.
引用本文 PDF XML SpringerLink
Mineral

3-D distribution of tensile stress in rock specimens for the Brazilian test

  • 通讯作者:

    Yong Yu    E-mail: yuyong2000@126.com

  • It is claimed that the formula used for calculating the tensile strength of a disk-shaped rock specimen in the Brazilian test is not accurate, because the formula is based on the 2-dimensional elastic theory and only suitable for very long or very short cylinders. The Matlab software was used to obtain the 2-dimensional distribution of stress in the rock specimen for Brazilian test. Then the 2-dimensional stress distribution in Brazilian disk was analyzed by the Marc FEM software. It can be found that the results obtained by the two software packages can verify each other. Finally, the 3-dimensional elastic stress in the specimen was calculated. The results demonstrate that the distribution of stress on the cross section of the specimen is similar to that in 2-dimension. However, the value of the stress on the cross section varies along the thickness of the specimen and the stress is bigger when getting closer to the end of the specimen. For the specimen with a height-to-diameter ratio of 1 and a Poisson’s ratio of 0.25, the tensile strength calculated with the classical 2-D formula is 23.3% smaller than the real strength. Therefore, the classical 2-D formula is too conservative.
  • Mineral

    3-D distribution of tensile stress in rock specimens for the Brazilian test

    + Author Affiliations
    • It is claimed that the formula used for calculating the tensile strength of a disk-shaped rock specimen in the Brazilian test is not accurate, because the formula is based on the 2-dimensional elastic theory and only suitable for very long or very short cylinders. The Matlab software was used to obtain the 2-dimensional distribution of stress in the rock specimen for Brazilian test. Then the 2-dimensional stress distribution in Brazilian disk was analyzed by the Marc FEM software. It can be found that the results obtained by the two software packages can verify each other. Finally, the 3-dimensional elastic stress in the specimen was calculated. The results demonstrate that the distribution of stress on the cross section of the specimen is similar to that in 2-dimension. However, the value of the stress on the cross section varies along the thickness of the specimen and the stress is bigger when getting closer to the end of the specimen. For the specimen with a height-to-diameter ratio of 1 and a Poisson’s ratio of 0.25, the tensile strength calculated with the classical 2-D formula is 23.3% smaller than the real strength. Therefore, the classical 2-D formula is too conservative.
    • loading

    Catalog


    • /

      返回文章
      返回