Replacement of alkali silicate solution with silica fume in metakaolin-based geopolymers

Ahmed Nmiri; Myriam Duc; Noureddine Hamdi; Oumaya Yazoghli-Marzouk; Ezzeddine Srasra

doi:10.1007/s12613-019-1764-2

Volume 26 Issue 5

May 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials > 2019 > 26(5): 555-564

Ahmed Nmiri, Myriam Duc, Noureddine Hamdi, Oumaya Yazoghli-Marzouk, and Ezzeddine Srasra, Replacement of alkali silicate solution with silica fume in metakaolin-based geopolymers, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 26(2019), No. 5, pp. 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-019-1764-2

Cite this article as:

Ahmed Nmiri, Myriam Duc, Noureddine Hamdi, Oumaya Yazoghli-Marzouk, and Ezzeddine Srasra, Replacement of alkali silicate solution with silica fume in metakaolin-based geopolymers, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 26(2019), No. 5, pp. 555-564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-019-1764-2

Citation:

PDF( 653 KB)

Research Article

Replacement of alkali silicate solution with silica fume in metakaolin-based geopolymers

+ Author Affiliations

Corresponding author:
Ahmed Nmiri E-mail: nmiriahmed@gmail.com
Received: 31 May 2018; Revised: 29 October 2018; Accepted: 30 October 2018

Abstract

Abstract

A metakaolin (Mk)-based geopolymer cement from Tunisian Mk mixed with different amounts of silica fume (SiO₂/Al₂O₃ molar ratio varying between 3.61 and 4.09) and sodium hydroxide (10 M) and without any alkali silicate solution, is developed in this work. After the samples were cured at room temperature under air for 28 d, they were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, environmental scanning electron microscopy, mercury intrusion porosimetry, ²⁷Al and ²⁹Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and compression testing to establish the relationship between microstructure and compressive strength. The XRD, FTIR, and ²⁷Al and ²⁹Si NMR analyses showed that the use of silica fume instead of alkali silicate solutions was feasible for manufacturing geopolymer cement. The Mk-based geopolymer with a silica fume content of 6wt% (compared with those with 2% and 10%), corresponding to an SiO₂/Al₂O₃ molar ratio of 3.84, resulted in the highest compressive strength, which was explained on the basis of its high compactness with the smallest porosity. Silica fume improved the compressive strength by filling interstitial voids of the microstructure because of its fine particle size. In addition, an increase in the SiO₂/Al₂O₃ molar ratio, which is controlled by the addition of silica fume, to 4.09 led to a geopolymer with low compressive strength, accompanied by microstructures with high porosity. This high porosity, which is responsible for weaknesses in the specimen, is related to the amount of unreacted silica fume.
- metakaolin;
- silica fume;
- geopolymer cement;
- compressive strength

FullText(HTML)

Supplements(0)

References(46)

References

[1]	M. Mustafa, A. Bakri, H. Mohammed, H. Kamarudin, I.K. Niza, and Y. Zarina, Review on fly ash-based geopolymer concrete without Portland Cement, J. Eng. Technol. Res., 3(2011), No. 1, p. 1.
[2]	M.A. Villaquirán-caicedo, R.M. de Gutiérrez, S. Sulekar, C. Davis, and J.C. Nino, Thermal properties of novel binary geopolymers based on metakaolin and alternative silica sources, Appl. Clay Sci., 118(2015), p. 276.
[3]	J. Davidovits, Properties of geopolymer cements,[in] First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Kiev, 1994, p. 131.
[4]	H.T. Huynh, New generation geopolymers,[in] 2nd French Seminar on Geopolymers, Clermont-Ferrand, 2013.
[5]	Y.M. Liew, C.Y. Heah, A.B. Mohd Mustafa, and H. Kamarudin, Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements:A review, Prog. Mater. Sci., 83(2016), p. 595.
[6]	P. Zhang, Y.X. Zheng, K.J. Wang, and J.P. Zhang, A review on properties of fresh and hardened geopolymer mortar, Composites Part B, 152(2018), p. 79.
[7]	C. Dupuy, A. Gharzouni, N. Texier-Mandoki, X. Bourbon, and S. Rossignol, Thermal resistance of argillite-based alkali-activated materials. Part 1:Effect of calcination processes and alkali cation, Mater. Chem. Phys., 217(2018), p. 323.
[8]	M.I. Khan, H.U. Khan, K. Azizli, S. Sufian, Z. Man, A.A. Siyal, N. Muhammad, and M.F. ur Rehman, The pyrolysis kinetics of the conversion of Malaysian kaolin to metakaolin, Appl. Clay Sci., 146(2017), p. 152.
[9]	J.S. Geng and Q. Sun, Effects of high temperature treatment on physical-thermal properties of clay, Thermochim. Acta, 666(2018), p. 148.
[10]	V. Medri, S. Fabbri, J. Dedecek, Z. Sobalik, Z. Tvaruzkova, and A. Vaccari, Role of the morphology and the dehydroxylation of metakaolins on geopolymerization, Appl. Clay Sci., 50(2010), No. 4, p. 538.
[11]	Y.M. Liew, H. Kamarudin, A.M. Mustafa Al Bakri, M. Luqman, I. Khairul Nizar, C.M. Ruzaidi, and C.Y. Heah, Processing and characterization of calcined kaolin cement powder, Constr. Build. Mater., 30(2012), p. 794.
[12]	Y.M. Liew, H. Kamarudin, A.M. Mustafa Al Bakri, M. Binhussain, M. Luqman, I. Khairul Nizar, C.M. Ruzaidi, and C.Y. Heah, Influence of solids-to-liquid and activator ratios on calcined kaolin cement powder, Phys. Procedia, 22(2011), p. 312.
[13]	C.Y. Heah, H. Kamarudin, A.M. Mustafa Al Bakri, M. Bnhussain, M. Luqman, I. Khairul Nizar, C.M. Ruzaidi, and Y.M. Liew, Kaolin-based geopolymers with various NaOH concentrations, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 20(2013), No. 3, p. 313.
[14]	P. De Silva, K. Sagoe-Crenstil, and V. Sirivivatnanon, Kinetics of geopolymerization:Role of Al₂O₃ and SiO₂, Cem. Concr. Res., 37(2007), No. 4, p. 512.
[15]	F.N. Okoye, J. Durgaprasad, and N.B. Singh, Effect of silica fume on the mechanical properties of fly ash based-geopolymer concrete, Ceram. Int., 42(2015), No. 2, p. 3000.
[16]	D. Dutta, S. Thokchom, P. Ghosh, and S. Ghosh, Effect of silica fume additions on porosity of fly ash geopolymers, J. Eng. Appl. Sci., 5(2010), No. 10, p. 74.
[17]	C.S. Poon, S.C. Kou, and L. Lam, Compressive strength, chloride diffusivity and pore structure of high performance metakaolin and silica fume concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 20(2006), No. 10, p. 858.
[18]	P. Duan, C.J. Yan, and W. Zhou, Compressive strength and microstructure of fly ash based geopolymer blended with silica fume under thermal cycle, Cem. Concr. Compos., 78(2017), p. 108.
[19]	M. Uysal, M.M. Al-mashhadani, Y. Aygörmez, and O. Canpolat, Effect of using colemanite waste and silica fume as partial replacement on the performance of metakaolin-based geopolymer mortars, Constr. Build. Mater., 176(2018), p. 271.
[20]	B.A. Latella, D.S. Perera, D. Durce, E.G. Mehrtens, and J. Davis, Mechanical properties of metakaolin-based geopolymers with molar ratios of Si/Al≈2 and Na/Al≈1, J. Mater. Sci., 43(2008), No. 8, p. 2693.
[21]	M. Rostami and K. Behfarnia, The effect of silica fume on durability of alkali activated slag concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 134(2017), p. 262.
[22]	D. Panias, I.P. Giannopoulou, and T. Perraki, Effect of synthesis parameters on the mechanical properties of fly ash-based geopolymers, Colloids Surf. A, 301(2007), No. 1-3, p. 246.
[23]	Z.H. Zhang, X. Yao, H.J. Zheng, and C. Yue, Role of water in the synthesis of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer, Appl. Clay Sci., 43(2009), No. 2, p. 218.
[24]	J.G.S. van Jaarsveld and J.S.J. van Deventer, Effect of the alkali metal activator on the properties of fly ash based geopolymers, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 38(1999), No. 10, p. 3932.
[25]	P.N. Lemougna, A.B. Madi, E. Kamseu, U.C. Melo, M.P. Delplancke, and H. Rahier, Influence of the processing temperature on the compressive strength of Na activated lateritic soil for building applications, Constr. Build. Mater., 65(2014), p. 60.
[26]	A.M.M. Al Bakri, H. Kamarudin, M. Bnhussain, J. Liyana, and C.M. Ruzaidi Ghazali, Nano geopolymer for sustainable concrete using fly ash synthesized by high energy ball milling, Appl. Mech. Mater., 313-314(2013), p. 169.
[27]	S.A. Bernal, E.D. Rodríguez, R. Mejía de Gutiérrez, M. Gordillo, and J.L. Provis, Mechanical and thermal characterisation of geopolymers based on silicate-activated metakaolin/slag blends, J. Mater. Sci., 46(2011), No. 16, p. 5477.
[28]	T. Revathi, R. Jeyalakshmi, and N. P. Rajamane, Study on the role of n-SiO₂ incorporation in thermo-mechanical and microstructural properties of ambient cured FA-GGBS geopolymer matrix, Appl. Surf. Sci., 449(2018), p. 322.
[29]	C. Kuenzel, L.M. Grover, L. Vandeperre, A.R. Boccaccini, and C.R. Cheeseman, Production of nepheline/quartz ceramics from geopolymer mortars, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 33(2013), No. 2, p. 251.
[30]	G. Kakali, T. Perraki, S. Tsivilis, and E. Badogiannis, Thermal treatment of kaolin:The effect of mineralogy on the pozzolanic activity, Appl. Clay Sci., 20(2001), No. 1-2, p. 73.
[31]	S. Ahmari, X. Ren, V. Toufigh, and L.Y. Zhang, Production of geopolymeric binder from blended waste concrete powder and fly ash, Constr. Build. Mater., 35(2012), p. 718.
[32]	W.K.W. Lee and J.S.J. van Deventer, Use of infrared spectroscopy to study geopolymerization of heterogeneous amorphous aluminosilicates, Langmuir, 19(2003), No. 21, p. 8726.
[33]	Q. Wan, F. Rao, S.X. Song, D.F. Cholico-González, and N.L. Ortiz, Combination formation in the reinforcement of metakaolin geopolymers with quartz sand, Cem. Concr. Compos., 80(2017), p. 115.
[34]	K. Gao, K.L. Lin, D.Y. Wang, H.S. Shiu, C.L. Hwang, and T.W. Cheng, Effects of nano-SiO₂ on setting time and compressive strength of alkali-activated metakaolin-based geopolymer, Open Civ. Eng. J., 7(2013), p. 84.
[35]	W.K.W. Lee and J.S.J. van Deventer, Structural reorganisation of class F fly ash in alkaline silicate solutions, Colloids Surf. A, 211(2002), No. 1, p. 49.
[36]	T. Bakharev, Geopolymeric materials prepared using Class F fly ash and elevated temperature curing, Cem. Concr. Res., 35(2005), No. 6, p. 1224.
[37]	J. Rocha and J. Klinowski, ²⁹Si and ²⁷Al magic-angle-spinning NMR studies of the thermal transformation of kaolinite, Phys. Chem. Miner., 17(1990), No. 2, p. 179.
[38]	P.S. Singh, M. Trigg, I. Burgar, and T. Bastow, Geopolymer formation processes at room temperature studied by ²⁹Si and ²⁷Al MAS-NMR, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 396(2005), No. 1-2, p. 392.
[39]	F.Škvára, L. Kopecký, J. Němeče k, and Z. Bittnar, Microstructure of geopolymer materials based on fly ash, Ceram. Silik., 50(2006), No. 4, p. 208.
[40]	A. Bourlon, Physico-chimie et Rhéologie de Géopolymères Frais Pour la Cimentation des Puits Pétroliers[Dissertation], Pierre et Marie Curie University, Paris, 2010.
[41]	M.A. Soleimani, R. Naghizadeh, A.R. Mirhabibi, and F. Golestanifard, Effect of calcination temperature of the kaolin and molar Na₂O/SiO₂ activator ratio on physical and microstructural properties of metakaolin based geopolymers, Iran. J. Mater. Sci. Eng., 9(2012), No. 4, p. 43.
[42]	P. Chindaprasirt, T. Chareerat, and V. Sirivivatnanon, Workability and strength of coarse high calcium fly ash geopolymer, Cem. Concr. Compos., 29(2007), No. 3, p. 224.
[43]	Y.S. Zhang, W. Sun, and Z.J. Li, Composition design and microstructural characterization of calcined kaolin-based geopolymer cement, Appl. Clay Sci., 47(2010), No. 3-4, p. 271.
[44]	C.K. Ma, A.Z. Awang, and W. Omar, Structural and material performance of geopolymer concrete:A review, Constr. Build. Mater., 186(2018), p. 90.
[45]	T. da S. Rocha, D.P. Dias, F.C.C. França, R.R. de S. Guerra, and L.R. da C. de O. Marques, Metakaolin-based geopolymer mortars with different alkaline activators (Na+and K+), Constr. Build. Mater., 178(2018), p. 453.
[46]	P. Duan, Z.G. Shui, W. Chen, and C.H. Shen, Effects of metakaolin, silica fume and slag on pore structure, interfacial transition zone and compressive strength of concrete, Constr. Build. Mater., 44(2013), p. 1.