
Cite this article as: | Xiao-hui Ning, Chen-zheng Liao, and Guo-qing Li, Electrochemical properties of Ca–Pb electrode for calcium-based liquid metal batteries, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 27(2020), No. 12, pp.1723-1729. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12613-020-2150-9 |
The Ca–Pb electrode couple is considered to be one of the least expensive (~36 $/(kW·h)) among various optional materials for liquid–metal batteries (LMBs). The electrochemical properties of Ca–Pb alloy in a Ca|LiCl–NaCl–CaCl2|Pb cell were investigated in this paper. The electrode potential maintained a linear relationship in the current density range of 50–200 mA·cm−2, which indicates that the alloying and dealloying processes of Ca with Pb attained rapid charge transfer and mass transport in the interface between the liquid electrode and electrolyte. The Ca–Pb electrode exhibited remarkable properties with a high discharge voltage of 0.6 V, a small self-discharge current density (<2 mA·cm−2 at 600°C), and a high coulombic efficiency (>98.84%). The postmortem analysis showed that intermetallics CaPb3 and CaPb were uniformly distributed in the electrode with different molar fractions of Ca, which indicates that the nucleation of solid intermetallics did not hinder the diffusion of Ca in the electrode. This investigation on Ca–Pb electrode sheds light on the further research and the design of electrodes for Ca-based LMBs.
The liquid–metal batteries (LMBs) have attracted increasing attention for their grid storage application; they are considered as the promising electrochemical energy storage devices because of their long cycle life, low cost, and easy scale-up [1–2]. Different from other battery systems, LMBs have a unique three-liquid-layer structure composed of a liquid anode, an electrolyte, and a cathode. Given the density differences and immiscibility, the cell can self-segregate into three distinct layers at the operating temperature [3]. The anode and cathode are on the top and bottom respectively, and are electrically isolated by the molten salt electrolyte. Attributed by the three-liquid-layer structure design of the LMBs, the liquid/liquid interface causes the facile charge transfer and fast mass transport between the electrode and electrolyte [4–6]. Meanwhile, the molten salt electrolyte has a high electrical conductivity and thus a low ohmic loss [7–9]. The combination of the above two features enables the operation of LMBs at high charge–discharge rates, which is suitable for grid storage.
To date, the development of electrode systems for LMBs mainly focuses on the lithium-based system owing to the lowest electronegativity and solubility of lithium in its halide salts [10]. Li||Bi [3], Li||Bi–Sb [11], Li||Sb–Pb [12], Li||Sb–Sn [13], Li||Te–Sn [14], and Li||Sb–Bi–Sn [10] were intensively investigated. The results showed that the lithium-based LMBs delivered an average discharge voltage of 0.6–1.2 V and energy densities of 60–150 W·h·kg−1. However, given the booming industry of lithium-ion battery, the restricted lithium supply for LMBs and the rapid price increase of lithium cannot be ignored.
Calcium is the fifth abundant element in the earth’s crust, and it has a low standard reduction potential of –2.87 V vs. NHE (normal hydrogen electrode). These features make Ca a sustainable negative-electrode material for LMBs considering its application for large-scale energy storage. Fundamental studies have reported the thermodynamic and electrochemical properties of calcium-based LMB systems, such as Ca||Sb [15–16] and Ca||Bi [17–18]. They showed the competitive battery performance compared with lithium-based systems. However, in view of the cost of antimony and bismuth, Ca–Pb electrode couple is considered to have an excellent voltage (~0.6 V) and the lowest cost (~36 $/(kW·h)) among various optional materials for Ca-based LMBs [2]. Meanwhile, Pb can also be alloyed with other elements to form Sb–Pb and Bi–Sb alloy positive electrodes; it can also contribute to the capacity beyond Sb and Bi. However, Ca has high solubility in its halide salts [19], which leads to the high self-discharge current in the Ca-based LMBs and therefore its low coulombic efficiency. The electrochemical properties of Ca–Pb in molten salt electrolyte are difficult to measure. Hence, Kim and his team [20] investigated the thermodynamic properties of Ca–Pb electrodes with CaF2 solid electrolyte, which has proven its potential application in LMBs.
Herein, we employed a multi-cation molten salt (LiCl–NaCl–CaCl2) as the electrolyte to suppress the solubility of Ca in molten salts. We proved the stability of the Ca–Pb system in a multi-cation electrolyte by measuring the electromotive force (emf) of the Ca–Pb electrode. Then, we investigated in detail the electrochemical properties of Pb as the positive electrode for potential application in LMBs and in the alloying–dealloying processes of Ca with Pb electrode.
The alloying and dealloying processes of Ca with Pb at the interface between the electrolyte and Pb electrode are illustrated as follows. During the alloying processes, Ca2+ is conducted through the electrolyte (mass transport), reduced, and then alloyed with Pb (charge transfer); Ca diffuses from the surface to the bulk of electrode (mass transport). The reverse of the processes occur when the Pb electrode is dealloyed.
The electrochemical cell in our study can be represented by the following formula:
Ca|LiCl−NaCl−CaCl2|Pb | (1) |
where a multi-cation molten salt of LiCl–NaCl–CaCl2 serves as the electrolyte with a molar ratio of 38.5:26.5:35.0 (melting temperature Tm = 457°C). The operating temperatures were set at 600 and 700°C in accordance with the Ca–Pb binary-phase diagram [21].
The potentials of the Ca–Pb electrode were calibrated to the value vs. pure Ca(s) by using the following equation:
E=EWE−Eref | (2) |
where EWE is the potential of the Ca–Pb working electrode (WE) vs. the Ca–Bi reference electrode (RE), and Eref is the potential of the RE vs. pure Ca(s). At 600 and 700°C, the value of Eref is 0.785 and 0.765 V, respectively [15].
Pure Pb (99.999%, Alfa Aesar) was premelted in a boron nitride (BN) crucible (Saint-Gobain Advanced Ceramics) inside a glovebox with an inert argon atmosphere (O2 < 1 × 10−7vol%, H2O < 1 × 10−7vol%) and served as the WE. 0.15mol% Ca–Bi alloy was used as the counter electrode (CE) by melting pure Bi (99.999%, Alfa Aesar) and Ca (99.99%, Aldrich) in the BN crucible. The surface area of CE should be maintained and considerably larger than that of WE to provide facile transfer kinetics. 0.35mol% Ca–Bi alloy was adopted as the RE and was prepared in the same manner. The RE of 0.35mol% Ca–Bi alloy was a mixture of Ca11Bi10(s) and Bi(l), which is in the two-phase region, to ensure the stability of the RE potential. The potential of the alloy used as RE is fixed and does not change with the composition [22].
The high-purity anhydrous salts of LiCl (99.995%, Alfa Aesar), NaCl (99.99%, Alfa Aesar), and CaCl2 (99.99%, Alfa Aesar) were used to prepare the LiCl–NaCl–CaCl2 electrolyte with the molar ratio of 38.5:26.5:35.0. To obtain dry and homogenous electrolytes, we premelted the molten salt in a stainless crucible by the following procedures. (1) The electrolyte was placed in a heatable sealed container, evacuated to a pressure below 1 Pa, and heated to 80°C; the vacuum and temperature were maintained for 12 h. (2) Temperature was increased from 80 to 250°C, and the vacuum and temperature were maintained for 12 h. (3) The electrolyte was heated to 700°C and kept for 3 h under a flowing argon gas at 0.2 cm3·s−1. (4) The premelted electrolyte was ground into lumps measuring 5–10 mm in diameter in the glove box after cooling down to room temperature.
The three-electrode electrochemical cell was assembled in a glove box. During the induction melting process, the tungsten wires with a diameter of 1 mm (99.95%, Alfa Aesar) were inserted into each electrode to establish electrical contact. The wire was wrapped in an alumina tube (99.8%, McDanel Advanced Ceramic Technologies). The prepared three electrodes were arranged in an alumina crucible (99.8%, McDanel Advanced Ceramic Technologies). Then, the electrolyte was added to cover the electrodes. The electrochemical cell was placed in a stainless steel chamber. Fig. 1 shows the configuration of the experiment.
Electrochemical measurement was carried out with a potentiostat–galvanostat (PGSTAT302N) and a frequency response analyzer (FRA32M). The current density of 50 mA·cm−2 was used in the coulometric titration experiment. The dwelling time of the alloying and dealloying of Ca with Pb of each step was set to 3000 s, and the relaxation time of 5000 s was used to obtain the accurate equilibrium electrode potential (Eeq) after each step. The estimation of the molar fraction of Ca in WE (xCa) was assumed to be of 100% coulombic efficiency in this study. The potential of the WE was recorded at different current densities to assess the rate capability. Finally, the electrode potential of WE was held at 0.45 and 1.40 V for 12 h at 600 and 700°C, respectively, to obtain the self-discharge current of the cell. Furthermore, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) was performed using a CHI660E electrochemical analyzer to accurately analyze the total resistance of the WE at the open circuit potential with a perturbation amplitude of 5 mV and a frequency range of 10 kHz to 0.01 Hz.
The WEs at different alloying stages during the alloying process were quenched for postmortem analysis. The electrodes were examined by a stereomicroscope (Olympus SZ61) to observe the macroscopic morphology, whereas the microscopic morphology and composition were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, JEOL6610) and energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS, IXRF System, Model 55i).
The coulometric titration method was adopted to measure the equilibrium potential of Ca–Pb WE in the LiCl–NaCl–CaCl2 molten salt electrolyte exactly. All measured results were compared with the data from the literature by using CaF2 solid electrolyte to verify the reliability of the multi-cation molten salt electrolyte [20], because the CaF2 was confirmed to have extremely low solubility of Ca metal in a previous study [23].
Fig. 2(a) shows the variation in the potential of Ca–Pb WE (E) and the current density (j) at 600°C. The equilibrium potential measured during the 12th and 13th dealloying steps were removed due to the drastic changes in the electrode potentials. The equilibrium potentials of Ca–Pb electrode at each molar fraction of Ca in the electrode were extracted from the value of the open circuit potential after each titration step. Figs. 2(b)–2(c) and Table 1 show the relationship of the equilibrium potentials of Ca–Pb electrode and the molar fraction of Ca in the Ca–Pb electrode. The test was performed at two different temperatures because the depth of titration varies with temperature. By comparing the data from our study and those in the literature [20] (Fig. 2 and Table 1), we can conclude that the emf values measured by using the multi-cation molten salt as the electrolyte and that measured by using CaF2 solid electrolyte were generally in good agreement (with difference of less than 3%). Thus, the multi-cation molten salt electrolyte can effectively diminish the solution of Ca. The slight differences may arise from the existence of self-discharge current. As shown in Fig. 2(b), the emf values dropped firstly and stabilized after decreasing to 0.6 V, but the emf values continually dropped in the Fig. 2(c). This result was caused by the increase in the solubility of Ca in Pb with the increase temperature.
xCa | 600°C | 700°C | |||
This work | Ref. [20] | This work | Ref. [20] | ||
0.02 | 0.69 | — | — | — | |
0.04 | 0.65 | — | 0.68 | — | |
0.06 | 0.63 | 0.62 | — | 0.65 | |
0.07 | 0.62 | — | 0.65 | — | |
0.10 | 0.61 | — | 0.62 | — | |
0.11 | 0.60 | — | — | — | |
0.12 | — | 0.60 | — | 0.61 | |
0.13 | 0.59 | — | 0.60 | — | |
0.15 | 0.58 | — | — | — | |
0.16 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.58 | |
0.18 | 0.56 | — | 0.57 | — | |
0.19 | 0.56 | — | — | — | |
0.21 | 0.56 | — | 0.55 | — | |
0.22 | 0.56 | 0.58 | — | 0.55 | |
0.23 | — | — | 0.54 | — | |
0.25 | — | — | 0.53 | — | |
0.26 | — | — | — | 0.53 | |
0.27 | — | — | 0.51 | — | |
0.29 | — | — | 0.50 | — | |
0.31 | — | — | 0.49 | — | |
0.33 | — | — | 0.48 | 0.49 | |
0.34 | — | — | 0.47 | — | |
0.35 | — | — | — | — | |
0.36 | — | — | 0.46 | — | |
0.39 | — | — | — | 0.46 | |
0.42 | — | — | — | — |
To evaluate the kinetics of Ca–Pb alloying and dealloying processes, we obtained the potential of Ca–Pb electrode at the current density range from 50 to 200 mA·cm−2 at 600 and 700°C. The corresponding results are shown in Fig. 3. The cut-off voltage of the electrode was set as the value where the potential changes dramatically in this test. Figs. 3(a) and 3(b) show that the electrodes exhibited highly chemically reversible electrode reaction. Thus, with the increase in current density, the overpotential of Ca–Pb electrode also increased. A low discharge capacity was observed at high current densities. The electrode potential consistently showed a sharp decrease near the end of the Ca–Pb alloying process. This event possibly resulted from the nucleation of solid Ca–Pb intermetallics at the interface of liquid electrode/electrolyte.
Coulombic efficiency is vital to the evaluation of the electrochemical properties of Ca||Pb cell. The coulombic efficiency of the Ca–Pb electrode at 600°C was estimated on the basis of the data from Fig. 3(a), and the corresponding results are shown in Table 2. The coulombic efficiency of the cell increased from 98.8% to 102.4% with the current density gradually increasing from 50 to 200 mA·cm−2. The variation in coulombic efficiency at different current densities can be attributed to the high self-discharge current of Ca–Pb electrode, which resulted from the high dissolution of Ca in the molten salt. Meanwhile, the dissolution of the Ca–Pb electrode in the electrolyte during the alloying process caused the loss of capacity, resulting in the coulombic efficiency exceeding 100% in the following dealloying process.
To investigate the self-discharge current in Ca||Pb cell quantitatively, we held the electrode potential of WE between 0.45 and 1.40 V for 12 h. Fig. 4 shows the measured self-discharge current of Ca–Pb electrode at 600°C and 700°C. The dealloying current flowed when the electrode potentials were greater than 0.7 V. This condition may be caused by the chemical transport of Ca into the Ca–Pb electrode with an electrode potential less than 0.7 V, that is, the alloying current flowed due to the dissolution of Ca–Pb alloy in the electrolyte [24]. However, when the electrode potential applied was close to 0.7 V, the self-discharge current density decreased to zero. The self-discharging current density for Ca–Pb was as low as 2 mA·cm−2 at 600°C compared with that at 700°C, which resulted in the high coulombic efficiency of the cell and ensured the accuracy of electrode potential measurement. This phenomenon may also prove that self-discharge current was mainly generated from the dissolution of Ca in the molten salt.
Current density / (mA·cm−2) | Coulombic efficiency / % |
50 | 98.84 |
100 | 99.27 |
150 | 100.00 |
200 | 102.42 |
The electrochemical impedance spectrum measurement was performed to understand the influence of charge transfer and mass transport on the electrochemical performance. Fig. 5(a) shows the Nyquist plots of Ca–Pb electrode at the open-circuit potentials at 700°C. The spectra formed a semi-circle at high frequencies and a straight line at low frequencies. The high-frequency semi-circle intercept represents the ohmic resistance Rohm, and the semi-circle width denotes the charge transfer resistance Rct. Table 3 tabulates the corresponding calculated impedance data of the charge transfer, ohmic, and mass transfer resistances.
xCa | Rt / Ω | Rohm / Ω | Rct / Ω | Rmt / Ω |
0.05 | 0.41 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 0.05 |
0.11 | 0.38 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.04 |
0.19 | 0.35 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.03 |
0.27 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.04 |
In the typical three-electrode setup of our work, the ohmic resistance Rohm was 0.06 Ω and was independent of the molar fraction of Ca in Ca–Pb alloy. However, the charge transfer resistance Rct decreased substantially with the increase of Ca content from 0.30 to 0.22 Ω. This finding may be attributed to the formation of uniform Ca–Pb intermetallic compounds with the increased Ca content in the WE. Therefore, the thickness of liquid Pb decreased in the electrode, which resulted in the reduced diffusion distance of Ca to Ca–Pb electrode and thus facilitated the alloying process. The mass transport resistance Rmt can be calculated by subtracting Rohm and Rct from the total resistance Rt. The total resistance Rt was acquired based on the calculation of the slope of the line in Fig. 5(b). The corresponding results are shown in Table 3. The mass transport resistance Rmt showed minimal contribution to the total resistance. Thus, the charge transfer resistance Rct plays a prominent role in the electrochemical process of the Ca–Pb alloying process.
We carried out postmortem analysis to investigate the microstructural evolution during the alloying process of Ca–Pb electrode. Three different samples with varying molar fractions of Ca were quenched to room temperature. All these Ca–Pb electrodes were prepared at 700°C with 200 mA·cm−2 current density. The molar fraction of Ca in these three electrodes was 0.05, 0.15, and 0.31, respectively. Fig. 6 shows the morphology of the electrodes and their composition. As shown in Fig. 6(a), the content of Ca in the WE was extremely low in the initial state of alloying. The electrode was mainly composed of Pb and contained a small amount of CaPb3. As the content of Ca rose to xCa = 0.15, the content of CaPb3 increased in the two-phase region in Fig. 6(b).
When the electrode was in the state of sharp potential drop (xCa = 0.31), a large amount of CaPb3 was generated in the electrode, and a high-calcium intermetallic CaPb appeared at the top of the electrode (Fig. 6(c)). The nucleation of CaPb may be due to the highly concentrated region of Ca formed when the electrode passed a high current. The formation of these solid intermetallics greatly reduced the activity of Ca, resulting in a sudden decrease in electrode potential (Fig. 3(b)). In particular, the intermetallics CaPb3 and CaPb did not accumulate at the interface between the electrode and the electrolyte but were uniformly distributed in the electrode. This finding indicates that the nucleation of solid intermetallics in the electrode did not hinder the diffusion of Ca in the electrode and did not cause a large loss in the coulombic capacity of the battery, consistent with the results in Fig. 3(b).
The electrochemical properties of Ca–Pb as the positive electrode for LMB were evaluated in LiCl–NaCl–CaCl2 molten salt. The solubility of Ca in the electrolyte was successfully suppressed by using the alloy electrode and a multi-cation electrolyte. The electrode potential of Ca–Pb alloy and current density maintained a good linear relationship in the current density range of 50–200 mA·cm−2, and this finding confirms that the Ca–Pb electrode has excellent kinetics performance. The Ca–Pb positive electrode exhibited a high discharge voltage of 0.6 V and a high coulombic efficiency over 98.84%. Meanwhile, the cell showed a small self-discharge current density. Near the end of the Ca–Pb alloying process, a large amount of dispersed intermetallic CaPb3 was found in the Ca–Pb electrode, which possibly resulted in a sudden drop in the electrode potential.
This work was financially supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFB0905600), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51874228 and U1766216), and the Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province, China (No. 2020JM-068).
D.J. Bradwell, H.J. Kim, A.H.C. Sirk, and D.R. Sadoway, Magnesium-antimony liquid metal battery for stationary energy storage, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 134(2012), No. 4, p. 1895. DOI: 10.1021/ja209759s
|
H.J. Kim, D.A. Boysen, J.M. Newhouse, B.L. Spatocco, B. Chung, P.J. Burke, D.J. Bradwell, J. Kai, A.A. Tomaszowska, K.L. Wang, W.F. Wei, L.A. Ortiz, S.A. Barriga, S.M. Poize-au, and D.R. Sadoway, Liquid metal batteries: Past, present, and future, Chem. Rev., 113(2013), No. 3, p. 2075. DOI: 10.1021/cr300205k
|
X.H. Ning, S. Phadke, B. Chung, H.Y. Yin, P. Burke, and D.R. Sadoway, Self-healing Li-Bi liquid metal battery for grid-scale energy storage, J. Power Sources, 275(2015), p. 370. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.173
|
H.A. Laitinen, R.P. Tischer, and D.K. Roe, Exchange current measurements in KCl–LiCl eutectic melt, J. Electrochem. Soc., 107(1960), No. 6, p. 546. DOI: 10.1149/1.2427740
|
A.D. Pasternak and D.R. Olander, Diffusion in liquid metals, AIChE J., 13(1967), No. 6, p. 1052. DOI: 10.1002/aic.690130604
|
G.J. Janz and N.P. Bansal, Molten salts data: Diffusion coefficients in single and multi-component salt systems, J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data, 11(1982), No. 3, p. 505. DOI: 10.1063/1.555665
|
L. Kartal and S. Timur, Direct electrochmical reduction of copper sulfide in molten borax, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 26(2019), No. 8, p. 992. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-019-1821-x
|
S.Q. Jiao and H. Zhu, Novel metallurgical process for titanium production, J. Mater. Res., 21(2006), No. 9, p. 2172. DOI: 10.1557/jmr.2006.0268
|
T. Dai, L. Yang, X.H. Ning, D.L. Zhang, R.L. Narayan, J. Li, and Z.W. Shan, A low-cost intermediate temperature Fe/Graphite battery for grid-scale energy storage, Energy Storage Mater., 25(2020), p. 801. DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2019.09.008
|
W. Zhao, P. Li, Z.W. Liu, D.L. He, K. Han, H.L. Zhao, and X.H. Qu, High-performance antimony-bismuth-tin positive electrode for liquid metal battery, Chem. Mater., 30(2018), No. 24, p. 8739. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b01869
|
T. Dai, Y. Zhao, X.H. Ning, R.L. Narayan, J. Li, and Z.W. Shan, Capacity extended bismuth-antimony cathode for high-performance liquid metal battery, J. Power Sources, 381(2018), p. 38. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.01.048
|
K.L. Wang, K. Jiang, B. Chung, T. Ouchi, P.J. Burke, D.A. Boysen, D.J. Bradwell, H.J. Kim, U. Muecke, and D.R. Sadoway, Lithium antimony-lead liquid metal battery for grid-level energy storage, Nature, 514(2014), No. 7522, p. 348. DOI: 10.1038/nature13700
|
H.M. Li, K.L. Wang, S.J. Cheng, and K. Jiang, High performance liquid metal battery with environmentally friendly antimony-tin positive electrode, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 8(2016), No. 20, p. 12830. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.6b02576
|
H.M. Li, K.L. Wang, H. Zhou, X.L. Guo, S.J. Cheng, and K. Jiang, Tellurium-tin based electrodes enabling liquid metal batteries for high specific energy storage applications, Energy Storage Mater., 14(2018), p. 267. DOI: 10.1016/j.ensm.2018.04.017
|
S. Poizeau, H.J. Kim, J.M. Newhouse, B.L. Spatocco, and D.R. Sadoway, Determination and modeling of the thermodynamic properties of liquid calcium-antimony alloys, Electrochim. Acta, 76(2012), p. 8. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2012.04.139
|
T. Ouchi, H.J. Kim, X.H. Ning, and D.R. Sadoway, Calcium-antimony alloys as electrodes for liquid metal batteries, J. Electrochem. Soc., 161(2014), No. 12, p. A1898. DOI: 10.1149/2.0801412jes
|
H.J. Kim, D.A. Boysen, D.J. Bradwell, B. Chung, K. Jiang, A.A. Tomaszowska, K.L. Wang, W.F. Wei, and D.R. Sadoway, Thermodynamic properties of calcium-bismuth alloys determined by emf measurements, Electrochim. Acta, 60(2012), p. 154. DOI: 10.1016/j.electacta.2011.11.023
|
H.J. Kim, D.A. Boysen, T. Ouchi, and D.R. Sadoway, Calcium-bismuth electrodes for large-scale energy storage (liquid metal batteries), J. Power Sources, 241(2013), p. 239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2013.04.052
|
R.A. Sharma, The solubilities of calcium in liquid calcium chloride in equilibrium with calcium-copper alloys, J. Phys. Chem., 74(1970), No. 22, p. 3896. DOI: 10.1021/j100716a009
|
N.D. Smith, N.E. Orabona, J.P.S. Palma, Y.R. Kong, C. Blanchard, and H.J. Kim, Thermodynamic properties of Ca–Pb electrodes determined by electromotive force measurements, J. Power Sources, 451(2020), art. No. 227745. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.227745
|
M. Idbenalia, C. Servantb, N. Selhaouia, and L. Bouirdena, A thermodynamic reassessment of the Ca–Pb system, Calphad, 32(2008), No. 1, p. 64. DOI: 10.1016/j.calphad.2007.10.004
|
C.J. Wen, B.A. Boukamp, R.A. Huggins, and W. Weppner, Thermodynamic and mass tra-nsport properties of “LiAl”, J. Electrochem. Soc., 126(1979), No. 12, p. 2258. DOI: 10.1149/1.2128939
|
A.S. Dworkin, H.R. Bronstein, and M.A. Bredig, The electrical conductivity of solutions of metals in their molten halides. VIII. Alkaline earth metal systems, J. Phys. Chem., 70(1966), No. 7, p. 2384. DOI: 10.1021/j100879a048
|
M. Okada, R.A. Guidotti, and J.D. Corbett, Solution of sodium alloys of some post-tra-nsition metals in molten sodium halides. Evidence for anions of bismuth and antimony, Inorg. Chem., 7(1968), No. 10, p. 2118. DOI: 10.1021/ic50068a035
|
[1] | Zhen-tao Dong, Yuan Li, Kai-liang Ren, Shu-qin Yang, Yu-meng Zhao, Yong-jie Yuan, Lu Zhang, Shu-min Han. Enhanced electrochemical properties of LaFeO3 with Ni modification for MH-Ni batteries [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2018, 25(10): 1201-1207. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-018-1672-x |
[2] | Bin-bin Wei, Yan-bo Wu, Fang-yuan Yu, Ya-nan Zhou. Preparation and electrochemical properties of carbon-coated LiFePO4 hollow nanofibers [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2016, 23(4): 474-480. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-016-1258-4 |
[3] | Tao Li, Juan-yu Yang, Shi-gang Lu. Effect of modified elastomeric binders on the electrochemical properties of silicon anodes for lithium-ion batteries [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2012, 19(8): 752-756. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-012-0623-1 |
[4] | Guo-qiang Liu, Xi Wang, Ya-jie Gao, Lei Wen, Guang-yin Liu, Jian-jie Zheng, Peng Cen, Ying Li. Electrochemical properties of LiNi0.5Mn1.3Ti0.2O4/Li4Ti5O12 cells [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2012, 19(5): 457-460. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-012-0579-1 |
[5] | Meng Chen, Shengjun Li, Chuang Yang. Structure and electrochemical properties of La, F dual-doped LiLa0.01Mn1.99O3.99F0.01 cathode materials [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2008, 15(4): 468-473. DOI: 10.1016/S1005-8850(08)60088-2 |
[6] | Tingfeng Yi, Xinguo Hu, Dianlong Wang, Huibin Huo. Effects of Al,F dual substitutions on the structure and electrochemical properties of lithium manganese oxide [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2008, 15(2): 182-186. DOI: 10.1016/S1005-8850(08)60035-3 |
[7] | Chaoli Yin, Hailei Zhao, Hong Guo, Xianliang Huang, Weihua Qiu. Effect of the synthesis method of SnSb anode materials on their electrochemical properties [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2007, 14(4): 345-349. DOI: 10.1016/S1005-8850(07)60068-1 |
[8] | Qin Lin, Dajian Zhu, Shuang Zhao. Electrochemical properties and structure of MlNi5-xSnx system [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2002, 9(4): 269-272. |
[9] | Ying Sing Fung, Ruqi Zhou. Physical and Electrochemical Properties of Acid 1-Methyl-3-Ethylimidazolium Chloride/AlCl3/LiAlCl4Molten Salt [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2000, 7(4): 286-291. |
[10] | Chuangang Lin, Weihua Qiu, Qingguo Liu. Electrochemical Studies of Lithium Intercalation into Graphite Film Electrode for Li+-ion Batteries [J]. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2000, 7(1): 48-50. |
1. | Yan Zhou, Boxin Li, Han Zhou, et al. Strategic alloy design for liquid metal batteries achieving high performance and economic stability. Journal of Energy Storage, 2024, 100: 113672. DOI:10.1016/j.est.2024.113672 |
2. | Han Zhou, Lei Huang, Meng Yu, et al. Stabilizing dual-cation liquid metal battery for large-scale energy storage: A comprehensive hybrid design approach. Energy Storage Materials, 2024, 70: 103540. DOI:10.1016/j.ensm.2024.103540 |
3. | Xianbo Zhou, Lei Fan, Shuai Yan, et al. Enhancing capacity utilization of Li|LiCl-KCl-CsCl|Bi (300 °C) liquid metal batteries through the application of external magnetic fields. Journal of Power Sources, 2024, 624: 235516. DOI:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2024.235516 |
4. | Yongxin Wu, Muya Cai, Hongya Wang, et al. Preparation of Pb-Ca Master Alloy by Molten Salt Electrolysis. Journal of The Electrochemical Society, 2023, 170(12): 122505. DOI:10.1149/1945-7111/ad155a |
5. | Shuai Yan, Lei Fan, Haomiao Li, et al. Novel High-Voltage Zn-Based Electrode Based on Displacement Reaction for Liquid Metal Batteries. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2023, 11(31): 11693. DOI:10.1021/acssuschemeng.3c04009 |
6. | Hongliang Xie, Jiangyuan Feng, Hailei Zhao. Lithium metal batteries with all-solid/full-liquid configurations. Energy Storage Materials, 2023, 61: 102918. DOI:10.1016/j.ensm.2023.102918 |
7. | Hao Wang, Cheng Peng. Solid electrolyte membrane-containing rechargeable high-temperature molten salt electrolyte-based batteries. Sustainable Energy & Fuels, 2023, 7(2): 330. DOI:10.1039/D2SE01525K |
8. | Sanjida Afrin, Enamul Haque, Baiyu Ren, et al. Liquid elementary metals and alloys: Synthesis, characterization, properties, and applications. Applied Materials Today, 2023, 31: 101746. DOI:10.1016/j.apmt.2023.101746 |
9. | Zhipan Li, Hongzhi Liu. Study on electrochemical properties of lead calcium tin anode for hydrometallurgy. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 2023, 82: 389. DOI:10.1016/j.aej.2023.10.024 |
10. | Yuhang Gao, Zhuqing Zhao, Yongxin Wu, et al. Separation of antimony from lead-antimony alloy by molten salt electrolysis. Separation and Purification Technology, 2022, 299: 121700. DOI:10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121700 |
11. | Guo-qing Li, Yue Zhao, Yan Zhou, et al. Intermediate-temperature liquid-solid metal battery by adopting Li4Ti5O12-based material as cathode. Electrochimica Acta, 2022, 409: 139990. DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2022.139990 |
12. | Wenlong Zhang, Chenzheng Liao, Xiaohui Ning. An advanced Ni–Graphite molten salt battery with 95 °C operating temperature for energy storage application. Chemical Engineering Journal, 2022, 435: 135110. DOI:10.1016/j.cej.2022.135110 |
13. | Shu-qiang Jiao, Ming-yong Wang, Wei-li Song. Editorial for special issue on high-temperature molten salt chemistry and technology. International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials, 2020, 27(12): 1569. DOI:10.1007/s12613-020-2225-7 |
xCa | 600°C | 700°C | |||
This work | Ref. [20] | This work | Ref. [20] | ||
0.02 | 0.69 | — | — | — | |
0.04 | 0.65 | — | 0.68 | — | |
0.06 | 0.63 | 0.62 | — | 0.65 | |
0.07 | 0.62 | — | 0.65 | — | |
0.10 | 0.61 | — | 0.62 | — | |
0.11 | 0.60 | — | — | — | |
0.12 | — | 0.60 | — | 0.61 | |
0.13 | 0.59 | — | 0.60 | — | |
0.15 | 0.58 | — | — | — | |
0.16 | 0.57 | 0.58 | 0.58 | 0.58 | |
0.18 | 0.56 | — | 0.57 | — | |
0.19 | 0.56 | — | — | — | |
0.21 | 0.56 | — | 0.55 | — | |
0.22 | 0.56 | 0.58 | — | 0.55 | |
0.23 | — | — | 0.54 | — | |
0.25 | — | — | 0.53 | — | |
0.26 | — | — | — | 0.53 | |
0.27 | — | — | 0.51 | — | |
0.29 | — | — | 0.50 | — | |
0.31 | — | — | 0.49 | — | |
0.33 | — | — | 0.48 | 0.49 | |
0.34 | — | — | 0.47 | — | |
0.35 | — | — | — | — | |
0.36 | — | — | 0.46 | — | |
0.39 | — | — | — | 0.46 | |
0.42 | — | — | — | — |
Current density / (mA·cm−2) | Coulombic efficiency / % |
50 | 98.84 |
100 | 99.27 |
150 | 100.00 |
200 | 102.42 |
xCa | Rt / Ω | Rohm / Ω | Rct / Ω | Rmt / Ω |
0.05 | 0.41 | 0.06 | 0.30 | 0.05 |
0.11 | 0.38 | 0.06 | 0.28 | 0.04 |
0.19 | 0.35 | 0.06 | 0.26 | 0.03 |
0.27 | 0.32 | 0.06 | 0.22 | 0.04 |