留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码
Volume 24 Issue 12
Dec.  2017
数据统计

分享

计量
  • 文章访问数:  505
  • HTML全文浏览量:  77
  • PDF下载量:  30
  • 被引次数: 0
Anchalee Manonukul, Sukrit Songkuea, Pongporn Moonchaleanporn,  and Makiko Tange, Effect of weld line positions on the tensile deformation of two-component metal injection moulding, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 24(2017), No. 12, pp. 1384-1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-017-1531-1
Cite this article as:
Anchalee Manonukul, Sukrit Songkuea, Pongporn Moonchaleanporn,  and Makiko Tange, Effect of weld line positions on the tensile deformation of two-component metal injection moulding, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 24(2017), No. 12, pp. 1384-1393. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-017-1531-1
引用本文 PDF XML SpringerLink
研究论文

Effect of weld line positions on the tensile deformation of two-component metal injection moulding

  • 通讯作者:

    Anchalee Manonukul    E-mail: anchalm@mtec.or.th

  • Knowledge of the mechanical properties of two-component parts is critical for engineering functionally graded components. In this study, mono-and two-component tensile test specimens were metal injection moulded. Three different weld line positions were generated in the two-component specimens. Linear shrinkage of the two-component specimens was greater than that of the mono-component specimens because the incompatibility of sintering shrinkage of both materials causes biaxial stresses and enhances sintering. The mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel were affected by the addition of a coloured pigment used to identify the weld line position after injection moulding. For the two-component specimens, the yield stress and ultimate tensile stress were similar to those of 316L stainless steel. Because 316L and 630 (also known as 17-4PH) stainless steels were well-sintered at the interface, the mechanical properties of the weaker material (316L stainless steel) were dominant. However, the elongations of the two-component specimens were lower than those of the mono-component specimens. An interfacial zone with a microstructure that differed from those of the mono-material specimens was observed; its different microstructure was attributed to the gradual diffusion of nickel and copper.
  • Research Article

    Effect of weld line positions on the tensile deformation of two-component metal injection moulding

    + Author Affiliations
    • Knowledge of the mechanical properties of two-component parts is critical for engineering functionally graded components. In this study, mono-and two-component tensile test specimens were metal injection moulded. Three different weld line positions were generated in the two-component specimens. Linear shrinkage of the two-component specimens was greater than that of the mono-component specimens because the incompatibility of sintering shrinkage of both materials causes biaxial stresses and enhances sintering. The mechanical properties of 316L stainless steel were affected by the addition of a coloured pigment used to identify the weld line position after injection moulding. For the two-component specimens, the yield stress and ultimate tensile stress were similar to those of 316L stainless steel. Because 316L and 630 (also known as 17-4PH) stainless steels were well-sintered at the interface, the mechanical properties of the weaker material (316L stainless steel) were dominant. However, the elongations of the two-component specimens were lower than those of the mono-component specimens. An interfacial zone with a microstructure that differed from those of the mono-material specimens was observed; its different microstructure was attributed to the gradual diffusion of nickel and copper.
    • loading
    • [1]
      D.F. Heaney, P. Suri, and R.M. German, Defect-free sintering of two material powder injection molded components. Part I Experimental investigations, J. Mater. Sci., 38(2003), No. 24, p. 4869.
      [2]
      J.R. Alcock, P.M. Logan, and D.J. Stephenson, Surface engineering by co-injection moulding, Surf. Coat. Technol., 105(1998), No. 1-2, p. 65.
      [3]
      P. Imgrund, A. Rota, F. Petzoldt, and A. Simchi, Manufacturing of multi-functional micro parts by two-component metal injection moulding, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 33(2007), No. 1-2, p. 176.
      [4]
      J.L. Johnson, L.K. Tan, R. Bollina, and R.M. German, Evaluation of copper powders for processing heat sinks by metal injection moulding, Powder Metall., 48(2005), No. 2, p. 123.
      [5]
      P. Suri, Chapter 14-Two-material/two-color powder metal injection molding (C2-PIM),[in] Handbook of Metal Injection Moulding, Edited by Donald Heaney, Woodhead Publishing Limited, Oxford, 2012, p. 338.
      [6]
      J.L. Johnson, L.K. Tan, P. Suri, and R.M. German, Design guidelines for processing bi-material components via powder-injection molding, JOM, 55(2003), No. 10, p. 30.
      [7]
      A. Simchi, A. Rota, and P. Imgrund, An investigation on the sintering behavior of 316L and 17-4PH stainless steel powders for graded composites, Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 424(2006), No. 1-2, p. 282.
      [8]
      M. Mulser, G. Veltl, and F. Petzoldt, Development of magnetic/non-magnetic stainless steel parts produced by two-component metal injection molding, Int. J. Precis. Eng. Manuf., 17(2016), No. 3, p. 347.
      [9]
      T. Harikou, Y. Itoh, K. Satoh, and H. Miura, Joining of SUS316L and SUS430L by insert injection molding, J. Jpn. Soc. Powder Powder Metall., 49(2002), No. 9, p. 841.
      [10]
      A. Islam, H. Hansen, M. Marhöfer, J. Angel, B. Dormann, and M. Bondo, Two-component micro injection moulding for hearing aid applications, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 62(2012), No. 5-8, p. 605.
      [11]
      V. Piotter, N. Holstein, K. Plewa, R.R. Ruprecht, and J. Hausselt, Replication of micro components by different variants of injection molding, Microsyst. Technol., 10(2004), No. 6-7, p. 547.
      [12]
      MPIF standard 35:Materials Standard for Metal Injection Molded Parts, Metal Powder Industries Federation (MPIF), Princeton, NJ, 2016.
      [13]
      MPIF Standard 42:Determination of Density of Compacted or Sintered Metal Powder Products, Metal Powder Industries Federation (MPIF), Princeton, NJ, 2000.
      [14]
      V. Firouzdor, A. Simchi, and A.H. Kokabi, An investigation of the densification and microstructural evolution of M2/316L stepwise graded composite during co-sintering, J. Mater. Sci., 43(2008), No. 1, p. 55.
      [15]
      V. Firouzdor and A. Simchi, Co-sintering of M2/17-4PH powders for fabrication of functional graded composite layers, J. Compos. Mater., 44(2010), No. 4, p. 417.
      [16]
      D. Ravi and D.J. Green, Sintering stresses and distortion produced by density differences in bi-layer structures, J. Eur. Ceram. Soc., 26(2006), No. 1-2, p. 17.
      [17]
      P. Suri, D.F. Heaney, and R.M. German, Defect-free sintering of two material powder injection molded components. Part Ⅱ Model, J. Mater. Sci., 38(2003), No. 24, p. 4875.
      [18]
      P. Imgrund, A. Rota, and A. Simchi, Microinjection moulding of 316L/17-4PH and 316L/Fe powders for fabrication of magnetic-nonmagnetic bimetals, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 200(2008), No. 1-3, p. 259.
      [19]
      Y.M. Li, L.J. Li, and K.A. Khalil, Effect of powder loading on metal injection molding stainless steels, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 183(2007), No. 2-3, p. 432.

    Catalog


    • /

      返回文章
      返回