Ti | Fe | H | O | Al | V |
0.1 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 0.2 | 6.1 | 4.1 |
Dajun Zhai, Tao Qiu, Jun Shen, and Keqin Feng, Growth kinetics and mechanism of microarc oxidation coating on Ti–6Al–4V alloy in phosphate/silicate electrolyte, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 29(2022), No. 11, pp.1991-1999. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12613-022-2413-8 |
Titanium and its alloys are widely used because of their high specific strength, ductility, corrosion resistance, and bio inertness [1–3]. They are regarded as critical materials particularly in the aerospace industry [4–5]. However, they experience problems such as contact corrosion, cold welding, and surface oxidation in aerospace applications. Microarc oxidation (MAO), which is also known as plasma electrolysis oxidation (PEO) [6–7], is an efficient and advanced surface treatment technology in which nanocrystalline ceramic coatings are grown in situ on threshold metals (such as aluminum, magnesium, and titanium) and their alloys through plasma discharge in an electrolyte at an instantaneous high temperature and high pressure [8–9]. Compared to conventional anodic oxidation processes, MAO uses a specific alternating current (AC) or pulse power supply with a high voltage (~250–750 V), which promotes the generation of microarcs and repeated breakdown of ceramic coatings [10]. The heat generated by microarcs considerably facilitates the crystallization of surrounding oxides, resulting in the in-situ formation of a crystalline ceramic coating. MAO coatings have a large thickness, high hardness, and strong bonding strength. This expands the application range of titanium and its alloys in harsh space environments [6, 11].
Unlike the continuous ion transport mechanism of anodic oxidation, MAO is complex and involves plasma physics, plasma chemistry, electrochemistry, thermochemistry, and acoustics [12]. Therefore, the mechanisms of plasma discharge and MAO coating growth are still unclear, particularly in titanium alloys. In addition to the threshold metal and power supply, the migration of electrolyte ions is important for revealing the growth mechanism of MAO coatings. Extensive research has been performed on silicate-based and phosphate-based electrolytes in this area. Laveissière et al. [13] used electrolytes with increasing complexity, i.e., mono-component, bi-component, and tri-component electrolytes, to study the influence of silicates on MAO coating characteristics. They found that the amorphous phase resulted directly from the presence of silicate in solution, and contained complex Si-based oxides that were difficult to clearly identify. Han et al. [14] controlled the oxidation time in a concentrated silicate electrolyte, and found that the silicate ions decomposed and deposited by plasma discharges contributed significantly to the formation of MAO coatings. Li et al. [15] found that the growth of MAO coatings in silicate electrolytes was dominated by the deposition of silicate oxides and mostly characterized by outward growth. In contrast, the growth of MAO coatings in phosphate electrolytes was dominated by the oxidation of titanium alloy substrates, which led to more inward growth. Aliasghari et al. [16] applied a wide range of duty cycles, current densities, waveforms, and treatment time and found that the silica was present in the veins that penetrate inner titania-rich materials. Cheng et al. [17] studied the kinetics of the formation of a MAO coating on Ti–6Al–4V alloy in a silicate-hexametaphosphate electrolyte and found that the coating growth rate was relatively high in the initial stages of the treatment, and it significantly decreased as the coating thickness increased. Ao et al. [18] used ultrasonic surface rolling to pretreat a titanium alloy and revealed that P from the silicate-phosphate electrolyte showed significant levels of agglomeration. This was correlated with the dissolution of the P-containing oxide, non-uniformity of discharge sparks, and difficult long-distance diffusion of long-chained (NaPO3)6. Mortazavi et al. [19] proposed that P-containing ions have low mobility and cannot diffuse through oxides; hence, they remain at the top of MAO coatings. It is currently believed that the use of a mixed silicate and phosphate electrolyte is a feasible optimization strategy to obtain coating with excellent performance, such as high adhesion and improved wear resistance [15]. However, the growth kinetics mechanism of MAO coating on titanium alloy in phosphate/silicate electrolyte is not yet well understood, either as a single electrolyte or a mixed electrolyte with a constant concentration of components.
In this study, binary electrolytes consisting of sodium phosphate and sodium silicate with different amounts of
Ti–6Al–4V alloy (Baoji Titanium Industry Co., Ltd., China) samples with a diameter of 10 mm and thickness of 5 mm were used for MAO experiments. The alloy composition is shown in Table 1. MAO was carried out using pulsed electrical power (5005M, ANS Power Supply Co., LTD., Wuxi) at 5 A/dm2. The pulse frequency and duty cycle of the power were set to 200 Hz and 10%, respectively. The electrolyte temperature was kept below 30°C by a heat-exchange system during the MAO process. Mixed electrolytes of Na3PO4·12H2O and Na2SiO4·9H2O with different ratios were prepared, and their compositions are shown in Table 2. Five time points (30, 240, 600, 960, and 1800 s) were selected to investigate coating growth based on the voltage–time response of the MAO process.
Ti | Fe | H | O | Al | V |
0.1 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 0.2 | 6.1 | 4.1 |
Group | PO3−4 | SiO2−3 |
P10 | 0.10 | 0 |
P7Si3 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
P6Si4 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
P5Si5 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
The surface and cross-sectional morphology of the MAO coatings were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM; Phenom ProX, Funa Scientific Instruments Co. Ltd., Netherlands) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM-2100F, JEOL Co., Ltd., Japan). The distributions of Ti, O, Al, Si, and P were determined by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; Phenom ProX, Funa Scientific Instruments Co. Ltd., Netherlands). The thickness of the MAO coating was detected by a coating thickness gauge (DUALSCOPE®MP0, Fischer, Germany), and the coating thickness was measured ten times at different locations and their average value was used as the final measured value of thickness. Cu Kα radiation was used at 40 kV and 30 mA over a 2θ range of 10° to 90° with a scan speed of 0.1°·s−1 to analyze the phase composition of the coating by X-ray diffraction (XRD; AL-2700B, Aolong Ray Instrument Group Co. Ltd., China). The potentiodynamic polarization curves of the samples with MAO treatment were measured in the 3.5wt% NaCl solution using an electrochemical measurement system (CS120, Wuhan Corrtest Instruments Corp., Ltd., China) (current precision 1 nA, voltage precision 500 μm) with a scan rate of 0.1 mV/s, from −0.4 to 0.2 V. Prior to the test, all samples were immersed in the test solution for 4 h to attain a stable open circuit potential (OCP). The OCP measurements were conducted every 5 min during this time.
The typical voltage–time response during the MAO of the Ti–6Al–4V alloy with the P/Si electrolytes is shown in Fig. 1. On the basis of the variation in plasma discharge intensity, MAO is divided into three processes, i.e., anodic oxidation, spark discharge, and microarc discharge, which is consistently observed in most studies [15,19–21]. During anodic oxidation, the voltage increased rapidly and linearly in all electrolytes. Bubbles were formed, but no discharge spark was observed. When the processing time exceeded 7 s, a faintly visible and relatively slow crackling discharge of electricity without sparking was observed on the surfaces of the samples. In addition, the voltage growth rate decreased, indicating that the anodized coatings were broken down. The breakdown voltage of the anodized coatings on the titanium alloy was approximately 140 V for all electrolytes. During spark discharge, white sparks were observed on the surfaces of the samples, and voltage increases exponentially. The voltage growth rate increased with increasing
Fig. 2 shows the surface morphology of a coating formed on the Ti–6Al–4V alloy in the P/Si electrolytes. For a treatment time of 30 s, submicron pores and worm-like discharge channels with a width of ~2 μm and a length of ~10 μm were observed on the surface of the P10 sample. This indicates that the first layer of the MAO coating formed during spark discharge was broken down and a second layer was formed gradually during stage I of microarc discharge. As the
Fig. 3 shows the surface element distributions of the MAO coatings obtained at 1800 s in the P/Si electrolyte. The elemental compositions of MAO coating were analyzed by EDS. The Si content on the surface of the MAO coating was significantly higher than the P content. This is because amorphous SiO2 is insoluble in the alkaline electrolyte and easily deposited on the coating surface, whereas P2O5 is easily hydrolyzed to
H2PO−4→HPO2−4+H+ | (1) |
HPO2−4→PO3−4+H+ | (2) |
4PO3−4→2P2O5+3O2↑+12e− | (3) |
SiO2−3→SiO2+1/2O2↑+2e− | (4) |
SiO2−3+H2OPlasma→SiO2+2OH− | (5) |
P2O5+3H2O→6H++2PO3−4 | (6) |
As the
Fig. 4 presents the cross-sectional morphologies and EDS spectra of the MAO coatings obtained at 1800 s in the P/Si electrolytes. A few supersized pores with a diameter of 10–20 μm were observed in the MAO coatings on the P10, P7Si3, and P6Si4 samples. Previous studies [17–18,22] have proposed that
Fig. 5 shows a TEM bright-field image, high-magnification image, selected area diffraction patterns, and EDS spectrum of the MAO coating obtained in the P5Si5 electrolyte. There was an evident layer of fully amorphous TiO2 with a thickness of approximately 50–100 nm at the coating/substrate interface. After the amorphous layer, there was an intermediate zone consisting of amorphous phase and crystallized anatase and a few rutile TiO2 grains. Moreover, several large pores surrounded by the amorphous phase with a high P content were observed. This reveals that the transport behavior of
The XRD patterns of the coated samples after 1800 s in the P/Si electrolytes are shown in Fig. 6. The broad peak between ~15° and 30° was attributed to the amorphous material. The magnitude of this peak increased with increasing
Group | Mass variation / % | ||
Rutile | Anatase | Ti and amorphous | |
P10 | 42.57 | 34.46 | 22.97 |
P7Si3 | 62.88 | 15.97 | 21.15 |
P6Si4 | 46.71 | 15.91 | 37.38 |
P5Si5 | 19.70 | 13.09 | 67.21 |
The electrochemical responses of the MAO-coated samples in a simulated corrosion process were evaluated by potentiodynamic polarization test in 3.5wt% NaCl solution, which has a similar salinity to that of sea water. Fig. 7 presents the potentiodynamic polarization curves of the MAO-coated samples fabricated in all electrolytes. The anodic/cathodic Tafel slopes (βa and βc), corrosion potential (Ecorr), and corrosion current density (jcorr) were derived from the data by Tafel extrapolation, as listed in Table 4. The polarization resistance (Rp) was calculated using the Stern-Geary equation [28]. The results of electrochemical tests showed that the polarization resistance of the coating gradually increased with increasing
Sample | βa / mV | βc / mV | icorr / (μA·cm−2) | Ecorr / mV | Rp / (kΩ·cm2) |
P10 | 2505.4 | 3493.6 | 36.54 | –0.09431 | 17.340 |
P7Si3 | 1315.9 | 2736.8 | 17.82 | –0.12161 | 21.658 |
P6Si4 | 911.2 | 1407.2 | 13.65 | –0.11736 | 17.597 |
P5Si5 | 1764.6 | 2276.2 | 15.15 | –0.098378 | 28.495 |
P10 | P7Si3 | P6Si4 | P5Si5 |
42.435 | 47.155 | 39.873 | 29.681 |
As shown in Fig. 8, the thickness (h) of MAO coatings in the P/Si electrolytes showed a piecewise linear increase with the process time (t). The growth of the coatings is described by the following equation:
h=at | (7) |
where a is a constant that represents the coating growth rate. The results showed that the value of a in stage I of microarc discharge is approximately the same as that in stage II, but significantly larger than that in stage III. Previous studies [29–30] showed that the incorporation rate of electronic or ionic charges plays a key role in coating growth. The variation in the incorporation rate of electronic charges between stages I and II of microarc discharge is negligible [19], resulting in approximately the same coating growth rate. However, the incorporation rate of electronic charges decreases significantly and then remains stable in stage III of microarc discharge, resulting in a linear increase of the coating at a low rate. Moreover, the duration of stage II of microarc discharge gradually decreases with increasing
Based on an analysis of the process voltage, coating morphology, coating composition, and electrochemical performance, a model of the mechanism of anion migration during the growth of MAO coatings is proposed to verify the test results, as shown in Fig. 9. A large number of micron pores, cracks, and filamentous channels were observed in the MAO coating, which constitute the multichannel network of ion transfer, as shown in Fig. 9(a).
MAO electrolytes were developed with low
(1)
(2) The thickness, density, phase content, and polarization resistance of the MAO coatings are primarily affected by the intensity of microarcs when the
(3) The thickness of MAO coatings obtained in the P/Si electrolytes have a piecewise linear increase with increasing process time during the three stages of microarc discharge.
This research is financially supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. 2021M700569) and Chongqing Postdoctoral Science Foundation (No. cstc2021jcyj-bsh0133).
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
[1] |
L. Zhou, S. Liu, J. Min, et al., Interface microstructure and formation mechanism of ultrasonic spot welding for Al–Ti dissimilar metals, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 28(2021), No. 9, p. 1506. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-020-2043-y |
[2] |
S. Laketić, M. Rakin, M. Momčilović, J. Ciganović, Đ. Veljović, and I. Cvijović-Alagić, Surface modifications of biometallic commercially pure Ti and Ti–13Nb–13Zr alloy by picosecond Nd: YAG laser, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 28(2021), No. 2, p. 285. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-020-2061-9 |
[3] |
D. Wang, S. Pang, C.Y. Zhou, Y. Peng, Z. Wang, and X.Z. Gong, Improve titanate reduction by electro-deoxidation of Ca3Ti2O7 precursor in molten CaCl2, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 27(2020), No. 12, p. 1618. DOI: 10.1007/s12613-020-2165-2 |
[4] |
C. Yang, S.H. Cui, Z.C. Wu, J.Y. Zhu, J. Huang, Z.Y. Ma, R.K.Y. Fu, X.B. Tian, P.K. Chu, and Z.Z. Wu, High efficient co-doping in plasma electrolytic oxidation to obtain long-term self-lubrication on Ti–6Al–4V, Tribol. Int., 160(2021), art. No. 107018. DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2021.107018 |
[5] |
K. Rokosz, T. Hryniewicz, and Ł. Dudek, Phosphate porous coatings enriched with selected elements via PEO treatment on titanium and its alloys: A review, Materials (Basel), 13(2020), No. 11, art. No. 2468. |
[6] |
B. Hamrahi, B. Yarmand, and A. Massoudi, Improved in-vitro corrosion performance of titanium using a duplex system of plasma electrolytic oxidation and graphene oxide incorporated silane coatings, Surf. Coat. Technol., 422(2021), art. No. 127558. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2021.127558 |
[7] |
S.W. Guan, M. Qi, C. Wang, S.Y. Wang, and W.Q. Wang, Enhanced cytocompatibility of Ti–6Al–4V alloy through selective removal of Al and V from the hierarchical micro-arc oxidation coating, Appl. Surf. Sci., 541(2021), art. No. 148547. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.148547 |
[8] |
M. Shokouhfar, C. Dehghanian, M. Montazeri, and A. Baradaran, Preparation of ceramic coating on Ti substrate by plasma electrolytic oxidation in different electrolytes and evaluation of its corrosion resistance: Part II, Appl. Surf. Sci., 258(2012), No. 7, p. 2416. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2011.10.064 |
[9] |
M. Kaseem, S. Fatimah, N. Nashrah, and Y.G. Ko, Recent progress in surface modification of metals coated by plasma electrolytic oxidation: Principle, structure, and performance, Prog. Mater. Sci., 117(2021), art. No. 100735. |
[10] |
F. Mécuson, T. Czerwiec, T. Belmonte, L. Dujardin, A. Viola, and G. Henrion, Diagnostics of an electrolytic microarc process for aluminium alloy oxidation, Surf. Coat. Technol., 200(2005), No. 1-4, p. 804. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2005.01.076 |
[11] |
M. Maryam, B. Kazem, and A. Fattah-alhosseini, Improving the wear resistance of plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coatings applied on Mg and its alloys under the addition of nano- and micro-sized additives into the electrolytes: A review, J. Magnes. Alloys, 9(2021), No. 4, p. 1164. DOI: 10.1016/j.jma.2020.11.016 |
[12] |
S. Stojadinović, R. Vasilić, J. Radić-Perić, and M. Perić, Characterization of plasma electrolytic oxidation of magnesium alloy AZ31 in alkaline solution containing fluoride, Surf. Coat. Technol., 273(2015), p. 1. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2015.03.032 |
[13] |
M. Laveissière, H. Cerda, J. Roche, L. Cassayre, and L. Arurault, In-depth study of the influence of electrolyte composition on coatings prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation of TA6V alloy, Surf. Coat. Technol., 361(2019), p. 50. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2018.12.122 |
[14] |
J.X. Han, Y.L. Cheng, W.B. Tu, T.Y. Zhan, and Y.L. Cheng, The black and white coatings on Ti–6Al–4V alloy or pure titanium by plasma electrolytic oxidation in concentrated silicate electrolyte, Appl. Surf. Sci., 428(2018), p. 684. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.09.109 |
[15] |
Q.B. Li, W.B. Yang, C.C. Liu, D.A. Wang, and J. Liang, Correlations between the growth mechanism and properties of micro-arc oxidation coatings on titanium alloy: Effects of electrolytes, Surf. Coat. Technol., 316(2017), p. 162. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2017.03.021 |
[16] |
S. Aliasghari, P. Skeldon, and G.E. Thompson, Plasma electrolytic oxidation of titanium in a phosphate/silicate electrolyte and tribological performance of the coatings, Appl. Surf. Sci., 316(2014), p. 463. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2014.08.037 |
[17] |
Y.L. Cheng, X.Q. Wu, Z.G. Xue, E. Matykina, P. Skeldon, and G.E. Thompson, Microstructure, corrosion and wear performance of plasma electrolytic oxidation coatings formed on Ti–6Al–4V alloy in silicate-hexametaphosphate electrolyte, Surf. Coat. Technol., 217(2013), p. 129. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.12.003 |
[18] |
N. Ao, D.X. Liu, X.H. Zhang, and G.Y. He, Microstructural characteristics of PEO coating: Effect of surface nanocrystallization, J. Alloys Compd., 823(2020), art. No. 153823. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.153823 |
[19] |
G. Mortazavi, J.C. Jiang, and E.I. Meletis, Investigation of the plasma electrolytic oxidation mechanism of titanium, Appl. Surf. Sci., 488(2019), p. 370. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.05.250 |
[20] |
S.W. Guan, M. Qi, Y.D. Li, and W.Q. Wang, Morphology evolution of the porous coatings on Ti–xAl alloys by Al adding into Ti during micro-arc oxidation in Na2B4O7 electrolyte, Surf. Coat. Technol., 395(2020), art. No. 125948. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.125948 |
[21] |
X.X. Zhang, G. Cai, Y. Lv, Y.L. Wu, and Z.H. Dong, Growth mechanism of titania on titanium substrate during the early stage of plasma electrolytic oxidation, Surf. Coat. Technol., 400(2020), art. No. 126202. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126202 |
[22] |
N. Ao, D.X. Liu, S.X. Wang, Q. Zhao, X.H. Zhang, and M.M. Zhang, Microstructure and tribological behavior of a TiO2/hBN composite ceramic coating formed via micro-arc oxidation of Ti–6Al–4V alloy, J. Mater. Sci. Technol., 32(2016), No. 10, p. 1071. DOI: 10.1016/j.jmst.2016.06.015 |
[23] |
S.A. Salehizadeh, I. Carvalho, R. Serra, S. Calderon V, P.J. Ferreira, A. Cavaleiro, and S. Carvalho, Role of Au incorporation in the electrochemical behavior of Ag/a:C nanocomposite coatings, Surf. Coat. Technol., 401(2020), art. No. 126240. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126240 |
[24] |
A. Bordbar-Khiabani, S. Ebrahimi, and B. Yarmand, In-vitro corrosion and bioactivity behavior of tailored calcium phosphate-containing zinc oxide coating prepared by plasma electrolytic oxidation, Corros. Sci., 173(2020), art. No. 108781. DOI: 10.1016/j.corsci.2020.108781 |
[25] |
S. Lederer, S. Sankaran, T. Smith, and W. Fürbeth, Formation of bioactive hydroxyapatite-containing titania coatings on CP-Ti 4+ alloy generated by plasma electrolytic oxidation, Surf. Coat. Technol., 363(2019), p. 66. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2019.02.030 |
[26] |
Y.M. Wang, B.L. Jiang, T.Q. Lei, and L.X. Guo, Microarc oxidation and spraying graphite duplex coating formed on titanium alloy for antifriction purpose, Appl. Surf. Sci., 246(2005), No. 1-3, p. 214. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2004.11.010 |
[27] |
A. Lugovskoy and S. Lugovskoy, Production of hydroxyapatite layers on the plasma electrolytically oxidized surface of titanium alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. C, 43(2014), p. 527. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2014.07.030 |
[28] |
L.J. Chen and R.K.L. Su, Corrosion rate measurement by using polarization resistance method for microcell and macrocell corrosion: Theoretical analysis and experimental work with simulated concrete pore solution, Constr. Build. Mater., 267(2021), art. No. 121003. DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121003 |
[29] |
L.M. Chang, Growth regularity of ceramic coating on magnesium alloy by plasma electrolytic oxidation, J. Alloys Compd., 468(2009), No. 1-2, p. 462. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2008.01.069 |
[30] |
E. Matykina, R. Arrabal, F. Monfort, P. Skeldon, and G.E. Thompson, Incorporation of zirconia into coatings formed by DC plasma electrolytic oxidation of aluminium in nanoparticle suspensions, Appl. Surf. Sci., 255(2008), No. 5, p. 2830. DOI: 10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.08.036 |
[31] |
Y.G. Ko, S. Namgung, and D.H. Shin, Correlation between KOH concentration and surface properties of AZ91 magnesium alloy coated by plasma electrolytic oxidation, Surf. Coat. Technol., 205(2010), No. 7, p. 2525. DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.09.055 |
[32] |
D.D. Wang, X.T. Liu, Y.K. Wu, H.P. Han, Z. Yang, Y. Su, X.Z. Zhang, G.R. Wu, and D.J. Shen, Evolution process of the plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) coating formed on aluminum in an alkaline sodium hexametaphosphate ((NaPO3)6) electrolyte, J. Alloys Compd., 798(2019), p. 129. DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2019.05.253 |
Stevan Stojadinović, Pedro Nelson. Formation of Alpha-Al2O3 Coatings on Tungsten Substrate by Plasma Electrolytic Oxidation. Ceramics, 2025, 8(2): 29.
![]() | |
Pengcheng Huo, Zhanyong Zhao, Peikang Bai, et al. Microstructure evolution mechanisms endowing high compression strength assisted by stacking fault-twin synergy in TiC/TC4 alloy nanocomposites prepared by laser powder bed fusion under hot isostatic pressing. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2025, 924: 147789.
![]() | |
J. Shang, E. Xue, G. Y. Gu. Effect of Ti3SiC2 particles addition on friction and oxidation behavior at high temperature of micro-arc oxidation layer on TC4 alloy. Digest Journal of Nanomaterials and Biostructures, 2025, 20(1): 351.
![]() |
Ti | Fe | H | O | Al | V |
0.1 | 0.3 | 0.015 | 0.2 | 6.1 | 4.1 |
Group | PO3−4 | SiO2−3 |
P10 | 0.10 | 0 |
P7Si3 | 0.07 | 0.03 |
P6Si4 | 0.06 | 0.04 |
P5Si5 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
Group | Mass variation / % | ||
Rutile | Anatase | Ti and amorphous | |
P10 | 42.57 | 34.46 | 22.97 |
P7Si3 | 62.88 | 15.97 | 21.15 |
P6Si4 | 46.71 | 15.91 | 37.38 |
P5Si5 | 19.70 | 13.09 | 67.21 |
Sample | βa / mV | βc / mV | icorr / (μA·cm−2) | Ecorr / mV | Rp / (kΩ·cm2) |
P10 | 2505.4 | 3493.6 | 36.54 | –0.09431 | 17.340 |
P7Si3 | 1315.9 | 2736.8 | 17.82 | –0.12161 | 21.658 |
P6Si4 | 911.2 | 1407.2 | 13.65 | –0.11736 | 17.597 |
P5Si5 | 1764.6 | 2276.2 | 15.15 | –0.098378 | 28.495 |
P10 | P7Si3 | P6Si4 | P5Si5 |
42.435 | 47.155 | 39.873 | 29.681 |