Cite this article as:

Zhiqiang Peng, Zibing Hou, Shuxian Xu, Ping Tang, and Guanghua Wen, Characterization of the formation of slag rims during hypo-peritectic steel continuous casting based on full-sectional microstructures, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-025-3196-5
Zhiqiang Peng, Zibing Hou, Shuxian Xu, Ping Tang, and Guanghua Wen, Characterization of the formation of slag rims during hypo-peritectic steel continuous casting based on full-sectional microstructures, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-025-3196-5
引用本文 PDF XML SpringerLink

基于全截面微观组织结构的亚包晶钢连铸过程渣圈形成特征研究

摘要: 纵裂纹是亚包晶钢连铸生产过程中最主要的缺陷。尽管通过控制水量和采用高结晶性保护渣促进弯月面缓冷等使得纵裂纹的发生频率大大降低,但连铸生产过程中的非规则因素是限制产品质量进一步提升的原因之一。连铸过程的粗大渣圈除了会作用于初生坯壳,还会导致液渣的不均匀流入,是引起非规则凝固的重要原因。现有的研究多集中于渣圈的宏观形态或局部区域微观形貌,缺乏对渣圈形成过程的完整认识。为此,本研究开发了一种全区域(厘米级)显微组织结构表征方法,用于研究连铸结晶器渣圈形成过程。研究发现两种高结晶性保护渣(A渣和B渣)渣圈的形成均以液渣凝固为主,仅有少量烧结相和液渣粘附于渣圈边缘。但是,两种保护渣的显微组织有所差别:A渣(高转折温度和高黏度)渣圈中存在明显的以粗大组织和细小组织交替出现的层状组织,粗大组织由黄长石过渡相构成,内部可见规则晶体析出;而B渣(较低转折温度和黏度)渣圈中未发现粗大过渡相组织,组织主要由规则黄长石晶体构成,晶体间存在玻璃相。结合数值模拟结果表明,渣圈形成与结晶器振动过程密切相关,渣圈前沿液渣凝固主要在结晶器负振程内发生。结晶器振动导致凝固前沿温度周期性变化,影响渣圈内部组织形成。结晶器向上振动时,渣圈凝固前沿温度上升,易形成粗大组织;向下振动时,温度下降且冷却速率大,更易形成细小组织。同时,由于物理性质的影响,高结晶性保护渣渣圈的形成过程存在两种路径:当转折温度较高、黏度较大且凝固区间较短时,在结晶器振动的影响下,更易形成粗大组织以及厚渣圈;而当转折温度较低、黏度较低且凝固区间较长时,液渣凝固慢,且宽的两相区导致渣圈前沿存在部分液相,更易形成薄渣圈。本研究在传统“Painting”机制基础上,丰富了亚包晶钢连铸过程中结晶性保护渣渣圈形成机理,为保护渣的选择优化提供了依据,对于保护渣渣圈厚度的多手段调控以及纵裂纹控制具有重要意义。

 

Characterization of the formation of slag rims during hypo-peritectic steel continuous casting based on full-sectional microstructures

Abstract: A full-sectional microstructure characterization method was developed to investigate the formation of coarse slag rims during the continuous casting of hypo-peritectic steel. The cross-sectional microstructural analysis of typical slag rims for two highly crystalline powders revealed that their formation was primarily driven by the solidification of the liquid slag. Distinct differences were observed in the microstructures of slag rims from the two powders. Powder A (characterized by a higher breaking temperature and viscosity) displayed alternating lamellar microstructures of coarse and fine phases, with the coarse phases composed of akermanite–gehlenite transition phases. In contrast, powder B (with a lower breaking temperature and viscosity) predominantly comprised regular akermanite–gehlenite crystals interspersed with a certain amount of glassy phases. Numerical simulations of a three-phase fluid flow coupled with heat transfer indicate that slag rim formation correlates with mold oscillation. Solidification of the liquid slag at the slag rim front predominantly occurs during the negative stroke of the mold oscillation. The average heating rate during the ascending stage of the mold reaches approximately 100 K·s1, whereas the average cooling rate during the descending stage attains 400 K·s1. This temperature variation leads to the formation of lamellar microstructures, whereas the ascending stage promotes the formation of coarse structures and thicker slag rims. Based on the powder properties, two distinct formation pathways exist for highly crystalline mold powders. For the powders with a higher breaking temperature, higher viscosity, and narrower solidification range (powder A), coarse microstructures and thicker slag rims were preferentially formed. For powders with lower breaking temperature and viscosity and wider solidification ranges (powder B), the liquid slag resisted rapid solidification, and the extended mushy zone allowed the partial liquid slag to persist at the slag rim front, promoting the formation of a thin slag rim. This study enhances the understanding of slag rim formation in highly crystalline mold powders and provides critical insights into the control of longitudinal surface cracks in hypo-peritectic steel.

 

/

返回文章
返回