Cite this article as:

Fernando Prado Araujo, Nívea Magalhães, Elvira Vassilieva, Gavyn Rollinson, Jens C.Ø. Andersen, Richard Crane, Stylianos Tampouris, Hannah S.R. Hughes, and Philippe Muchez, Mineralogical controls on Ni and Co recovery during HCl leaching of laterites, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-026-3396-7
Fernando Prado Araujo, Nívea Magalhães, Elvira Vassilieva, Gavyn Rollinson, Jens C.Ø. Andersen, Richard Crane, Stylianos Tampouris, Hannah S.R. Hughes, and Philippe Muchez, Mineralogical controls on Ni and Co recovery during HCl leaching of laterites, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-026-3396-7
引用本文 PDF XML SpringerLink

红土矿盐酸浸出过程中镍、钴回收的矿物学控制作用

摘要: 镍、钴市场需求持续攀升,红土矿床是镍钴战略资源的重要供给来源。现有红土矿处理工艺以火法冶炼、高压酸浸为主,普遍存在能耗高、环境负荷大等问题。为突破现有工艺瓶颈,盐酸浸出等氯化物浸出工艺凭借工况适应性强、常压浸出效果优异的优势,成为近年来湿法冶金领域的研究热点。目前,氯化物浸出技术的优化研究多聚焦于后续分离纯化与金属回收工段,用以解决该工艺酸矿比偏高、因非选择性浸出导致的浸出液杂质含量高、镍钴净化难度大(如共吸附损失)等固有缺陷。但金属高效提取的核心关键,在于明晰酸溶过程中矿石矿物的反应演变规律,现阶段关于红土矿中镍、钴目标金属及杂质元素的赋存特征与浸出响应机理,仍缺乏系统研究。红土矿矿物体系复杂,厘清不同矿物在盐酸浸出过程中的溶出行为,对提升镍钴浸出效率具有重要指导意义。本文以8 mol/L盐酸为浸出剂,在95℃、常压、浸出3 h的条件下开展红土矿浸出试验,系统探究矿物学因素对镍钴回收效果的影响。研究结果表明:红土矿盐酸浸出过程中镍、钴的浸出回收率存在显著差异,金属浸出行为受矿石矿物类型的矿物学控制作用主导。镍的溶出释放特征,主要取决于其在可酸溶矿物中的赋存分布,红土原矿中镍主要赋存于钴锰矿(锰羟基氧化物)、铁羟基氧化物(针铁矿等)、绿泥石、蛇纹石及含镍蒙脱石黏土矿物中。钴主要赋存于可酸溶矿物体系,以钴锰矿为主要载体,铁羟基氧化物与绿泥石为辅,同时部分钴赋存于难浸铬铁矿中,且红土矿铬铁矿中钴含量波动较大,介于2wt%~55wt%。浸出渣矿物学表征结果证实,盐酸可有效溶蚀绝大多数赋存镍钴的硅酸盐、羟基氧化物矿物,但无法分解难浸铬铁矿。浸出渣中残留的铬铁矿会固存部分钴元素,直接导致常压盐酸浸出体系无法实现钴的完全回收。本研究明确了不同矿物差异化溶解行为对红土矿镍钴冶金回收指标的控制作用,研究成果可为红土矿湿法冶金工艺流程优化提供理论支撑,可依据矿物赋存特征精准调控浸出工艺参数,规避矿物学因素对金属回收的不利影响,进而最大化提升镍、钴综合回收效率。

 

Mineralogical controls on Ni and Co recovery during HCl leaching of laterites

Abstract: Demand for nickel (Ni) and cobalt (Co) is rising, with laterite deposits being an increasingly important source. However, current processing methods (e.g., smelting or high-pressure acid leaching) are energy-intensive and pose environmental hazards. To address this challenge, there has been increasing interest in chloride leaching, particularly with HCl, due to its flexibility and efficacy at ambient conditions. To date, much of the focus on advancing the chloride leaching technology has been on the downstream separation and recovery stages, to overcome its inherent disadvantages, such as a high acid-to-ore ratio, impure leachates due to non-selective leaching, and difficulties in Ni-Co purification (e.g., co-adsorption losses). Nonetheless, effective metal extractions depend on understanding the underlying behavior of ore minerals during acid dissolution. The deportment of target metals (Ni–Co) and impurities, and their leaching mechanisms, remains poorly understood. Given the complex mineralogy of laterites, information on how minerals behave in HCl leaching is paramount to improve leaching efficiency. This study reveals that metal extraction during HCl leaching (8 mol/L, 3 h, 95°C, ambient pressure) is uneven and controlled by specific ore minerals. The release of Ni is governed by its distribution in acid-soluble minerals asbolane (Mn-hydroxide), Fe oxyhydroxides (e.g., goethite), chlorite, serpentine, and clay minerals (Ni-bearing smectite group) in the laterite feed. Conversely, for Co, although predominantly hosted by acid-soluble minerals (asbolane, with minor contributions from Fe oxyhydroxides and chlorite), it is also present in insoluble chromite. Deportment of Co in chromite varies from around 2wt% to 55wt% in the laterite ores. Examination of leaching residues confirms that HCl effectively dissolves most ore minerals, except refractory chromite. Therefore, chromite retention in the residue sequesters part of the Co content and prevents the total Co recovery during atmospheric HCl leaching. Overall, this work highlights the vital role of mineral-specific dissolution mechanisms in controlling metallurgical performance. This knowledge is crucial for flowsheet development, enabling precise adjustment of leaching steps to target ore minerals, account for mineralogical factors that limit recovery, and thereby maximize metal yield.

 

/

返回文章
返回