Cite this article as:

Research Article

Hydrometallurgical leaching and kinetic modeling of low-grade manganese ore with banana peel in sulfuric acid

+ Author Affiliations
  • Corresponding authors:

    Sajjad Ali    E-mail:

    Khizar Hussain Shah    E-mail:

  • Received: 17 January 2020Revised: 8 April 2020Accepted: 13 April 2020Available online: 16 April 2020
  • Manganese was leached from a low-grade manganese ore (LGMO) using banana peel as the reductant in a dilute sulfuric acid medium. The effects of banana peel amount, H2SO4 concentration, reaction temperature, and time on Mn leaching from the complex LGMO were studied. A leaching efficiency of ~98% was achieved at a leaching time of 2 h, banana peel amount of 4 g, leaching temperature of 120°C, manganese ore amount of 5 g, and sulfuric acid concentration of 15vol%. The phase, microstructural, and chemical analyses of LGMO samples before and after the leaching process confirmed the successful leaching of manganese. Furthermore, the leaching process followed the shrinking core model and the leaching rate was controlled by a surface chemical reaction (1 − (1 − x)1/3 = kt) mechanism with an apparent activation energy of 40.19 kJ·mol−1.
  • 加载中

  • [1] J.M. Lu, D. Dreisinger, and T. Glück, Manganese electrodeposition—A literature review, Hydrometallurgy, 141(2014), p. 105. doi:  10.1016/j.hydromet.2013.11.002
    [2] H.L. Zhang, G.C. Zhu, H. Yan, Y.N. Zhao, T.C. Li, and X.J. Feng, Reduction of low-grade manganese dioxide ore pellets by biomass wheat stalk, Acta Metall. Sin. Engl. Lett., 26(2013), No. 2, p. 167. doi:  10.1007/s40195-012-0250-x
    [3] C. Xie, L.J. Xu, T.F. Peng, K. Chen, and J. Zhao, Leaching process and kinetics of manganese in low-grade manganese ore, Chin. J. Geochem., 32(2013), No. 2, p. 222. doi:  10.1007/s11631-013-0625-3
    [4] C. Abbruzzese, M.Y. Duarte, B. Paponetti, and L. Toro, Biological and chemical processing of low-grade manganese ores, Miner. Eng., 3(1990), No. 3-4, p. 307. doi:  10.1016/0892-6875(90)90126-V
    [5] S.B. Kanungo, Rate process of the reduction leaching of manganese nodules in dilute HCl in presence of pyrite: Part I. Dissolution behavior of iron and sulphur species during leaching, Hydrometallurgy, 52(1999), No. 3, p. 313. doi:  10.1016/S0304-386X(99)00023-7
    [6] R. N. Sahoo, P.K. Naik, and S.C. Das, Leaching of manganese from low-grade manganese ore using oxalic acid as reductant in sulphuric acid solution, Hydrometallurgy, 62(2001), No. 3, p. 157. doi:  10.1016/S0304-386X(01)00196-7
    [7] H. Vu, J. Jandova, K. Lisa, and F. Vranka, Leaching of manganese deep ocean nodules in FeSO4–H2SO4–H2O solutions, Hydrometallurgy, 77(2005), No. 1-2, p. 147. doi:  10.1016/j.hydromet.2004.09.012
    [8] M.S. Bafghi, A. Zakeri, Z. Ghasemi, and M. Adeli, Reductive dissolution of manganese ore in sulfuric acid in the presence of iron metal, Hydrometallurgy, 90(2008), No. 3, p. 207.
    [9] Z. Cheng, G.C. Zhu, and Y.N. Zhao, Study in reduction–roast leaching manganese from low-grade manganese dioxide ores using cornstalk as reductant, Hydrometallurgy, 96(2009), No. 1-2, p. 176. doi:  10.1016/j.hydromet.2008.08.004
    [10] A. Lasheen, M.N. Eihazek, A.S. Helal, and W. EI-nagar, Recovery of manganese using molasses as reductant in nitric acid solution, Int. J. Miner. Process., 92(2009), No. 3, p. 109.
    [11] Q. Tang, H. Zhong, S. Wang, J.Z. Li, and G.Y. Liu, Reductive leaching of manganese oxide ores using waste tea as reductant in sulfuric acid solution, Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China, 24(2014), No. 3, p. 861. doi:  10.1016/S1003-6326(14)63136-8
    [12] S. Ali, Y. Iqbal, U. Farooq, and S. Ahmad, Leaching of manganese ores using corncob as reductant in H2SO4 solution, Physicochem. Probl. Miner. Process., 52(2016), No. 1, p. 56.
    [13] S. Ali, Y. Iqbal, K. Ahmad and B. Afridi Phase, Microstructure and beneficiation of manganese ore by acid leaching, J. Miner. Mater. Charact. Eng., 6(2018), No. 1, p. 60.
    [14] D. Hariprasad, B. Dash, M.K. Ghosh, and S. Anad, Leaching of manganese ores using sawdust as a reductant, Miner. Eng., 20(2007), No. 14, p. 1293. doi:  10.1016/j.mineng.2007.07.013
    [15] Y.J. LV, J. Su, Y.X. Wen, H.F. Su, K.D. Yang, and X.Y. LV, Leaching kinetics of pyrolusite by macromolecular melanoidins of molasses alcohol wastewater in H2SO4, Procedia Eng., 18(2011), p. 107. doi:  10.1016/j.proeng.2011.11.017
    [16] H. Aripin, I.M. Joni, N. Busaeri, I. Usrah, I.N. Sudiana, and S. Sabchevski, Banana peel reductant for leaching medium grade manganese ore in sulfuric acid solution, AIP Conf. Proc., 1823(2017), art. No. 020020.
    [17] S.C. Das, P.K. Sahoo, and P.K. Rao, Extraction of manganese from low-grade manganese ores by FeSO4 leaching, Hydrometallurgy, 8(1982), No. 1, p. 35. doi:  10.1016/0304-386X(82)90029-9
    [18] Y.H. Wang, S.L. Jin, Y. Lv, Y.J. Zhang, and H.F. Su, Hydrometallurgical process and kinetics of leaching manganese from semi-oxidized manganese ores with sucrose, Minerals, 7(2017), No. 2, p. 27. doi:  10.3390/min7020027
    [19] I. De Michelis, F. Ferella, E. Karakaya, F. Beolchini, and F. Vegliò, Recovery of zinc and manganese from alkaline and zinc-carbon spent batteries, J. Power Sources, 172(2007), No. 2, p. 975. doi:  10.1016/j.jpowsour.2007.04.092
    [20] F. Vegliè and L. Toro, Fractional factorial experiments in the development of manganese dioxide leaching by sucrose in sulphuric acid solutions, Hydrometallurgy, 36(1994), No. 2, p. 215. doi:  10.1016/0304-386X(94)90007-8
    [21] R. Sánchez Orozco, P. Balderas Hernández, G. Roa Morales, F. Ureña Núñez, J. Orozco Villafuerte, V. Lugo Lugo , N. Flores Ramírez, C.E. Barrera Díaz, and P. Cajero Vázquez, Characterization of lignocellulosic fruit waste as an alternative feedstock for bioethanol production, BioResources, 9(2014), No. 2, p. 1873.
    [22] W.B. White and S. Roy, Infrared spectra-crystal structure correlations: II. Comparison of simple polymorphic minerals, Am. Mineral., 49(1964), No. 11-12, p. 1670.
    [23] M. Fahad, S. Ali, and Y. Iqbal, Plasma diagnostics by optical emission spectroscopy on manganese ore in conjunction with XRD, XRF and SEM-EDS, Plasma Sci. Technol., 21(2019), No. 8, art. No. 085507. doi:  10.1088/2058-6272/ab1977
    [24] S. Ali, Y. Iqbal, and M. Fahad, A comprehensive phase, minero-chemical and microstructural investigation of low-grade manganese ore, Mater. Res. Express, 6(2019), No. 11, art. No. 115527. doi:  10.1088/2053-1591/ab4c23
    [25] K.H. Shah, A. Ghafoor, M. Fahad, S. Ali, and H. Ahmad, Natural ferruginous manganese ore as a potential low-cost adsorbent for congo red dye removal from aqueous solution, Mater. Res. Express, 6(2019), No. 12, art. No. 125515. doi:  10.1088/2053-1591/ab56b8
    [26] H.F. Su, H.K. Liu, F. Wang, X.Y. Lü, and Y.X. Wen, Kinetics of reductive leaching of low-grade pyrolusite with molasses alcohol wastewater in H2SO4, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 18(2010), No. 5, p. 730. doi:  10.1016/S1004-9541(09)60121-X
    [27] F.F. Wu, H. Zhong, S. Wang, and S.F. Lai, Kinetic of reductive leaching of manganese oxide ore using cellulose as reductant, J. Cent. South Univ., 21(2014), No. 5, p. 1763. doi:  10.1007/s11771-014-2122-1
    [28] J.R. Xue, H. Zhong, S. Wang, C.X. Li, J.Z. Li, and F.F. Wu, Kinetics of reduction leaching of manganese dioxide ore with Phytolacca americana in sulfuric acid solution, J. Saudi Chem. Soc., 20(2016), No. 4, p. 437. doi:  10.1016/j.jscs.2014.09.011
    [29] N. Birkner and A. Navrotsky, Thermodynamics of manganese oxides: Effects of particle size and hydration on oxidation-reduction equilibria among hausmannite, bixbyite, and pyrolusite, Am. Mineral., 97(2012), No. 8-9, p. 1291. doi:  10.2138/am.2012.3982
    [30] G.M. Yavorskaya, V.A. Arsentev, V.L. Kucher, and O.V. Kovaleva, Redox leaching of manganese from oxide feed materials, US Patent, No. 1733492, 1992.
    [31] A.A. Ismail, E.A. Ali, A. Ibrahim, and M.S. Ahmed, A comparative study on acid leaching of low grade manganese ore using some industrial wastes as reductants, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 82(2008), No. 6, p. 1296. doi:  10.1002/cjce.5450820618
    [32] R. Ziyadanogullari and M. Buyuksahin, Recovery of MnSO4 from low-grade pyrolusite ores, and of MnSO4 and silver from manganese-silver ores, Sep. Sci. Technol., 30(1995), No. 3, p. 477. doi:  10.1080/01496399508013884
    [33] V.A. Arsent'ev, G.M. Yavorskaya, and O.V. Kovaleva, Manganese recovery from oxide ores by leaching with acid, US Patent, No. 1624038, 1991.
    [34] F.W.Y. Momade and Z.G. Momade, Reductive leaching of manganese oxide ore in aqueous methanol-sulphuric acid medium, Hydrometallurgy, 51(1999), No. 1, p. 103. doi:  10.1016/S0304-386X(98)00077-2
    [35] M. Rodriguez, J. Rivarola, and M. del C. Ruiz, The effects of carboxylic acid addition on hydrofluoric acid autoclave leaching of a ferrocolumbite, Hydrometallurgy, 74(2004), No. 1-2, p. 39. doi:  10.1016/j.hydromet.2003.12.007
  • [1] Tong-hua Liu, Wei Wang, Wen-jiang Qiang, and  Guo-gang Shu, Mechanical properties and kinetics of thermally aged Z3CN20.09M cast duplex stainless steel, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
    [2] Elham Hosseini, Fereshteh Rashchi, and  Abolghasem Ataie, Ti leaching from activated ilmenite-Fe mixture at different milling energy levels, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
    [3] Aref Sardari, Eskandar Keshavarz Alamdari, Mohammad Noaparast, and  Sied Ziaedin Shafaei, Kinetics of magnetite oxidation under non-isothermal conditions, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
    [4] Cui Wang, Jian-liang Zhang, Guang-wei Wang, Ke-xin Jiao, Zheng-jian Liu, and  Kuo-chih Chou, Combustion characteristics and kinetics of anthracite with added chlorine, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
    [5] Guang-ju Chen, Jian-ming Gao, Mei Zhang, and  Min Guo, Efficient and selective recovery of Ni, Cu, and Co from low-nickel matte via a hydrometallurgical process, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
    [6] Yong-sheng Sun, Yue-xin Han, Yan-feng Li, and  Yan-jun Li, Formation and characterization of metallic iron grains in coal-based reduction of oolitic iron ore, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
    [7] Saman Beikzadeh Noei, Saeed Sheibani, Fereshteh Rashchi, and  Seyed Mohammad Javad Mirazimi, Kinetic modeling of copper bioleaching from low-grade ore from the Shahrbabak Copper Complex, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
    [8] Fu-yuan Zhang, Ya-jie Zheng, and  Guo-min Peng, Deselenization and detellurization of precious-metal ore concentrates by swelling oxidizing roasting and successive alkaline leaching, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
    [9] P. C. Beuria, S. K. Biswal, B. K. Mishra, and  G. G. Roy, Kinetics of thermal decomposition of hydrated minerals associated with hematite ore in a fluidized bed reactor, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
    [10] Cong Xu, Hong-wei Cheng, Guang-shi Li, Chang-yuan Lu, Xiong-gang Lu, Xing-li Zou, and  Qian Xu, Extraction of metals from complex sulfide nickel concentrates by low-temperature chlorination roasting and water leaching, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
    [11] Ping Xue, Guang-qiang Li, Yong-xiang Yang, Qin-wei Qin, and  Ming-xing Wei, Recovery of valuable metals from waste diamond cutters through ammonia-ammonium sulfate leaching, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater.,
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌,
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(10) / Tables(3)

Share Article

Article Metrics

Article views(1753) PDF downloads(33) Cited by()

Proportional views

Hydrometallurgical leaching and kinetic modeling of low-grade manganese ore with banana peel in sulfuric acid

  • Corresponding authors:

    Sajjad Ali    E-mail:

    Khizar Hussain Shah    E-mail:

  • 1. Materials Research Laboratory, Department of Physics, University of Peshawar, 25120 Peshawar, Pakistan
  • 2. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, University Road 22060 Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • 3. Department of Chemistry, COMSATS University Islamabad, Abbottabad Campus, University Road 22060 Abbottabad, Pakistan

Abstract: Manganese was leached from a low-grade manganese ore (LGMO) using banana peel as the reductant in a dilute sulfuric acid medium. The effects of banana peel amount, H2SO4 concentration, reaction temperature, and time on Mn leaching from the complex LGMO were studied. A leaching efficiency of ~98% was achieved at a leaching time of 2 h, banana peel amount of 4 g, leaching temperature of 120°C, manganese ore amount of 5 g, and sulfuric acid concentration of 15vol%. The phase, microstructural, and chemical analyses of LGMO samples before and after the leaching process confirmed the successful leaching of manganese. Furthermore, the leaching process followed the shrinking core model and the leaching rate was controlled by a surface chemical reaction (1 − (1 − x)1/3 = kt) mechanism with an apparent activation energy of 40.19 kJ·mol−1.

1.   Introduction
  • Manganese is an important industrial metal and is widely used in the manufacturing of steel, alloys, fertilizers, paints, and chemicals [13]. The hydrometallurgical leaching of low-grade manganese ore (LGMO) has attracted significant interest in the last decade. Mn is typically obtained via the reductive leaching of manganese oxides using various reductants such as aqueous sulfur oxide (highly toxic), pyrite, iron sulfate, iron metal, and oxalic acid [48]. However, these reductants are expensive, hazardous, non-environment friendly, and less efficient, making industrial-scale production of manganese non-viable. These drawbacks have led to alternative routes and materials that are not only environmentally friendly, low cost, and efficient but also economical for manganese production. In this regard, the abundance and availability of cellulose-rich agricultural by-products can be utilized for manganese leaching owing to their low cost, effectiveness, and environment-friendly nature. Mn has been leached from manganese oxide ores in sulfuric acid medium using various agricultural by-products and plant powders, e.g., tea waste, molasses, corn-stalk, corncob, and sawdust [913]. Banana peel is another raw material, which is rich in cellulose (25.5wt%), and can be used as an efficient reductant for leaching manganese from LGMO. Banana peels are abundantly found in fruit markets and can be easily collected from such places, making them ideal for industrial applications.

    From a geological perspective, the chemical composition of Mn-ores varies with its location and source, thus affecting the reaction pathway for the recovery of Mn from LGMO. Previous studies on the reductive leaching kinetics of pyrolusite reported that the relevant reaction is controlled by diffusion via a product layer, using a shrinking core model (SCM) [1415].

    The annual production/consumption of bananas in Pakistan is more than 154000 t, of which >30% is wasted in the form of peels. This disposal is costly and also pollutes the environment. Such problems can be addressed by developing a hygienic disposal system or transforming the waste into a useful raw material. Researchers are working towards recycling and utilizing banana peels for various purposes such as production of absorbents, preparation of porous carbon foams, and production of fillers and lingo-cellulose nanoparticles [16].

    The present study aims at investigating the leaching potential of banana peels as a reductant for extracting manganese from its ores. The effects of processing parameters, such as banana peel amount, H2SO4 concentration, reaction temperature, and time, on the leaching rate of manganese were investigated. In addition, to derive the dissolution rate constant and determine the apparent activation energy (Ea), various kinetic models were applied and investigated.

2.   Experimental
  • Samples of raw LGMO were collected from Prang Ghar, Mohmand district, Pakistan. Banana peels were obtained from a banana seller in a local market. The collected samples were properly washed with deionized water and dried in a hot-air oven (FREAS 605, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) at 90°C overnight and then crushed and grinded using a stainless-steel mortar and pestle system.

    All the leaching experiments were performed in a fume hood (LFH-120 SCI, LabTech, Vietnam) using 250 mL glass beaker in a precision constant-temperature water bath with a magnetic stirrer on a hot plate (PC-420D, USA). In a typical experiment, 5 g of the LGMO sample (200 mesh) and 1–4 g of sieved (100 mesh) banana peels were added to 50 mL aqueous H2SO4 solution (5vol%–20vol%) while stirring (300 r/min) at a temperature range of 60–100°C (333–373 K) for 20–120 min. After the pre-determined time for the experiment, the slurry was cooled at room temperature and filtered via a Whatman filter paper. The slurry was properly washed and dried in a drier at 90°C for 2 h. In all the experiments, the pregnant leach solution containing a high concentration of manganese in the form of manganese sulfate was examined for manganese content using atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS 700, Perkin Elmer, USA). For the phase, microstructural, and chemical analyses of the leftover manganese content, X-ray diffractometer (XRD; X’Pert3 Powder, PANalytical, Netherland), scanning electron microscopy (SEM; JEOL JSM 5910, Japan) and X-ray fluorescence spectroscopy (XRF; EDX-7000 unit, Shimadzu, Japan) were applied, respectively. The yield was determined using Eq. (1):

3.   Results and discussion
  • From an experimental viewpoint, manganese cannot be directly leached from manganese ore with H2SO4 without a suitable reducing agent. Therefore, the effect of the concentration of glucose present in the banana peels on the leaching efficiency of LGMO was investigated by varying the amount of banana peels (1, 2, 4, and 6 g) at an initial H2SO4 concentration of 5vol% at 80°C for 2 h. Fig. 1 shows the relevant results. The leaching efficiency of manganese gradually increased with an increase in the amount of banana peels. The yield reached a maximum value of ~87% when the banana peel amount was 4 g, following which it decreased.

    Figure 1.  Effect of banana peel on the yield of manganese leaching

    The XRF results listed in Table 1 point to a manganese decomposition of ~18wt%, probably because of the release of Mn2+ from LGMO into the aqueous solution at a banana peel amount of 4 g [17]; however, this dramatic increase in the leaching efficiency was not remarkable when the banana peel amount was 6 g, in which case the efficiency decreased abruptly to ~78%. Approximately 6wt% of manganese (Table 1) remained in the leached residue, indicating that manganese could not be recovered completely from the multiphase complex manganese ore, where some phases of manganese are difficult to leach in an acidic solution [1819]. Similarly, the presence of a high silica content (~42wt%) in the residue implies that the leaching is restricted due to the encapsulation of manganese in the gangue.

    Chemical composition of as-mined LGMO before leaching
    Chemical composition of LGMO after leaching with banana peel under optimum parameters

    Table 1.  XRF chemical analyses of LGMO before and after leaching wt%

  • Several experiments were performed to determine the optimum temperature for leaching manganese from LGMO in dilute sulfuric acid (5vol%). All the experimental conditions were kept constant except for the temperature, which was varied from 60 to 120°C at 20°C intervals. The concentration of manganese in the pregnant leach solution obtained at varying temperatures was measured using AAS. Fig. 2 shows the results, indicating a high manganese leaching efficiency at a leaching temperature of 120°C. The yield of manganese increases from ~28% to 98% as the temperature is gradually increased from 60 to 120°C. The reduction of MnO2 mainly depends on the hydrolysis of cellulose (polysaccharides) or lactose (disaccharides) into monosaccharaide compounds. For example, glucose is responsible for the reduction process and the hydrolysis process is directly proportional to the temperature, which increases the hydrolysis rate [20]. This can be attributed to the decrease in the solution viscosity with increasing temperature. Further increasing the temperature above 100°C did not show any significant increase in the yield of manganese (it only slightly increased from 97% to 98%); therefore, from an economic perspective, the most favorable temperature is 100°C.

    Figure 2.  Influence of temperature on the yield of manganese leaching from its ore.

  • The influence of leaching time on the yield of Mn leaching was studied in the 2–5 h time window. Fig. 3 shows the results in graphical form. The observations made can be attributed to the fact that manganese reduces from its ore due to the available fixed amount of banana peel that hydrolyzed its constituent hemicellulose in sulfuric acid. Since no additional hemicellulos is available, further increasing the time does not influence the manganese leaching efficiency.

    Previous studies also reported that at low concentrations of banana peel, all the available hemicellulose in the banana peels (25.5wt%) was utilized for manganese reduction [16,21]. The time–yield plot (Fig. 3) shows an anomalous behavior. The leaching efficiency is the highest at a leaching time of 2 h. The leaching efficiency abruptly decreases up to 3 h, then increases in the 3–4 h window, and ultimately decreases after 5 h. The abrupt decrease in the leaching efficiency at a leaching time of 3 h may be attributed to the fact that all the available hemicellulose in banana peels was utilized for manganese reduction during this time. The decrease in the leaching rate for 3 h may also indicate a low leaching activity in hydrometallurgical processes. The optimum leaching time was, therefore, set to 2 h at which the manganese leaching efficiency was maximum (~73%). The dissolution of manganese from LGMO by plant powders containing glucose is known to occur in at least four steps (in series): (1) hydrolyzation of monosaccharaides, (2) diffuses of the reductant from liquid to Mn-grains via the boundary layer, (3) nucleation and hydration of the products at the active sites, and (4) diffusion into the solution. Thus involved reactions are strictly time-dependent [22].

    Figure 3.  Effect of time on the yield of manganese leached from LGMO.

  • The influence of H2SO4 concentration on the dissolution of manganese from LGMO was examined by varying the concentration from 5vol% to 20vol% at intervals of 5vol% while keeping the other parameters constant, i.e., leaching time of 2 h, manganese ore amount of 5 g, banana peel amount of 2 g, temperature of 80°C, and agitation rate of 300 r/min. Fig. 4 shows the results. The leaching efficiency was ~73% at a concentration of 5vol% and increased up to ~98% at 15vol%. This demonstrates that the hydrolyzing degree of polysaccharide and cellulose significantly improved at an H2SO4 concentration of 15vol% and accelerated the leaching of manganese from LGMO by obtaining hydrogen ions more easily [18]. The decomposition rate of MnO2 was higher at 15vol% H2SO4, further verifying the encapsulation of manganese in the gangue minerals, because the presence of more concentrated H2SO4 allowed more dissolution and relieved more manganese ions to the solution. However, a further increase in the H2SO4 concentration up to 20vol% caused an abrupt decrease in the manganese leaching efficiency up to ~72%, demonstrating that the leaching activity of Mn from LGMO in hydrometallurgical processes is relatively low at higher H2SO4 concentrations [20]. Consequently, from an economic perspective, an H2SO4 concentration of 15vol% seems to be adequate for Mn leaching; any additional consumption of H2SO4 should be avoided.

    Figure 4.  Effect of sulfuric acid concentration on the yield of manganese leached from LGMO.

  • To investigate the hydrometallurgical reductive leaching of Mn from LGMO using banana peels, the phase(s), chemical composition, and microstructural analyses before and after leaching were carried out using XRD, XRF, and SEM−EDS, respectively. The XRD pattern of the LGMO sample revealed that the sample was mainly composed of pyrochroite (MnO2), hausmannite (Mn3O4), spessartine (Mn3Al2(SiO4)3), pyrolusite (Mn(OH)2), quartz (SiO2), hematite (α-Fe2O3), and calcite (CaCO3) [23]. The phase analysis after leaching revealed the disappearance of most of the phases leaving quartz as the residue and a single peak for pyrolusite (Fig. 5), where the inter-planner spacing (d-values) and relative intensities corresponding to the observed XRD peaks for the residue (after leaching) matched those of quartz (SiO2) as the major phase along with a single peak at 2θ = 28.66° indicating the presence of pyrolusite as a secondary minor phase in the residue.

    Figure 5.  XRD pattern of LGMO after leaching.

    Table 1 lists the results of the chemical analyses of LGMO before and after leaching. It is further confirmed that most of the manganese in the LGMO was leached from the sample and that the manganese content decreased from 24.17wt% to 6.13wt% in the residue, i.e., after leaching.

    Figs. 6(a) and 6(b) show the morphological changes in the ore grains/particles before and after hydrometallurgical leaching observed by SEM, respectively. The SEM image, shown in Fig. 6(a), reveals highly compact manganese ore grains of varying sizes (~50 mm) before leaching [2425]. The surface morphology of the investigated LGMO sample was changed to porous and small, thin needle-like micro-features after leaching (Fig. 6(b)).

    Figure 6.  Secondary electron SEM images of LGMO (a) before leaching and (b) after leaching.

  • The LGMO contains several phases of manganese oxide encapsulated in gangue grains, such as quartz and hematite, as confirmed by XRD and XRF analyses. Furthermore, the manganese particles appear to be dispersed within the host gangue mineral, making the structure even more complex. Moreover, the SEM analysis confirms that the morphology of the LGMO after leaching changes significantly from a smooth surface to a rough one with needle-like features. These results support the appropriateness of using the SCM to describe the kinetics of manganese leaching from LGMO. In general, the classical models provide three basic equations to interpret the surface chemical reaction controlled kinetic model (Eq. (2)), internal diffusion-controlled kinetic model (Eq. (3)), and mixed-controlled kinetic model (Eq. (4)) [2628]:

    where x is the fraction of the manganese reacted; t is the leaching time, min; and k is the apparent reaction rate constant, min−1.

    The leaching efficiency of manganese leaching from LGMO in the time range of 10–60 min out of the range of 10–120 min at various temperatures (60–100°C (333–373 K)) describe the measurement of a sensible rate that is appropriate for studying the leaching mechanism (Fig. 7). The kinetic data for manganese extraction were evaluated using various kinetic models (Eqs. (2)–(4)) to judge the reaction mechanism. The results are shown in Figs. 8(a)8(c), which demonstrates the good fit of the SCM (Eq. (2)) with the highest correlation coefficient values (R2). This indicates that the extraction of Mn is controlled by a surface chemical reaction mechanism.

    Figure 7.  Effect of reaction temperature on the yield of manganese from LGMO at various time durations.

    Figure 8.  Plots of various kinetic model equations versus time at different temperatures for leaching manganese from LGMO: (a) 1 − (1 − x)1/3 = kt; (b) 1 – (2/3)x − (1 − x)2/3 = kt; (c) [(1−x)−1/3 − 1] + (1/3)ln(1 − x) = kt.

    Table 2 lists the values of the shrinking core rate constant obtained at different temperatures. With the rate constant values, the apparent activation energy (Ea) was determined using the well-known Arrhenius equation:

    Temperature / KRate constant / (10–3 min–1)ΔG / (kJ∙mol–1)Ea / (kJ∙mol–1)ΔH / (kJ∙mol–1)ΔS / (J∙K–1∙mol–1)

    Table 2.  Kinetic and thermodynamic parameters for manganese leaching from LGMO.

    where k is the reaction rate constant, and lnA is the Arrhenius factor, Ea is the apparent activation energy (kJ∙mol−1), R is the gas constant (R = 8.315 J∙K−1∙mol−1), and T is the absolute temperature. Fig. 9 shows that the plot of lnk versus 1/T is linear, demonstrating a good fit of the Arrhenius model with a slope Ea/(RT) and intercept ln A. The desired value of the activation energy (Table 2) was determined from the slope of the linear plot, which agreed well with those reported in literature [15,26].

    Figure 9.  Plot of ln k versus the reciprocal of temperature for leaching manganese from LGMO.

    The thermodynamic parameters, such as the activation, enthalpy change (ΔH), and entropy change (ΔS), were determined using the well-known Eyring equation (Eq. (6)). The linear form of the Eyring equation is given as

    where k and T represent the core diffusion rate constant and absolute temperature, respectively, R is the general gas constant, KB is the Boltzmann constant, and h is the Planck’s constant. Fig. 10 shows the thermodynamic Eyring plot, which exhibits a straight line with the slope and intercept equal to ΔH/R and (ln KB)/h + ΔS/R, respectively. Eq. (7) was used to calculate the Gibbs free energy of activation (ΔG):

    Figure 10.  Plot of ln(k/T) versus the reciprocal of temperature for leaching manganese from LGMO.

    Table 2 lists the values of ΔH, ΔS, and ΔG. Clearly, the ΔG value increases with an increase in the temperature, demonstrating the spontaneity and feasibility of the reaction.

    The higher positive values of ΔG at all the temperatures indicate that a driving force from an external source is necessary for the formation of an activated complex during the extraction. The positive ΔH values point to an endothermic nature of the leaching process, while the negative values of ΔS suggest that the activated complex exhibits a more ordered structure [29]. The results obtained in the present study regarding the maximum leaching efficiency of manganese under optimum conditions were compared with previously reported values and are summarized in Table 3.

    ReductantOreConditionsKey resultsRefs.
    GlucoseMn nodules2.5 M NH3, 0.37 M NH4Cl, 0.2 g of
    glucose per gram of nodules, 85°C, 4 h
    100% Cu, 90% Ni, 60% Co recovery[30]
    Sawdust (C6H10O5)Low Mn oreAqueous H2SO490%–95% Mn recovery (99.6% pure)[31]
    Sucrose (C12H24O11)Pyrolusite50–90°C, 20 g/L of sucrose, 1 M H2SO4, leaching time of 30 min94%–95% Mn recovery[20,17]
    Lactose (C12H22O11)Low Mn ore100 mesh Mn ore, 2 h, 90°C, 20%
    90%–92% Mn recovery[32]
    Mn–Ag oreTwo stage leaching with H2SO4 and
    then thiourea
    97% Mn, 98% Ag and Au recovery[32]
    GlycerineMn oreAqueous H2SO4 Increased Mn recovery[33]
    Triethanolamine and thiosulfateMnO2 1 M H2SO4, 200 mesh Mn ore, 2 M thiosulfateMaximum Mn recovery[30]
    Oxalic acid (OX)Low Mn ore30.6 g/L OX, 0.5 M H2SO4, 85°C,
    105 min
    98.4% Mn recovery[34]
    Carboxylic acid (15%)
    HF (9%)
    Ferro columbiteHF + tartaric (TR), citric, formic,
    oxalic (OX) acids
    86% Fe, 90% Mn recovery[35]

    Table 3.  Reductive leaching of manganese using agricultural/biomass wastes

4.   Conclusions
  • Reductive leaching of LGMO was successfully carried out using banana peel as the reductant in a dilute sulfuric acid medium. The present study demonstrated that the leaching efficiency of manganese can be significantly improved up to ~98% by appropriately selecting the weight of the banana peels used (4 g); the other optimum conditions are a leaching time of 2 h, leaching temperature of 120°C, a manganese ore amount of 5 g, and a sulfuric acid concentration 15vol%. The chemical and morphological investigations of the LGMO before and after leaching confirmed that a high amount of manganese was successfully leached into the pregnant leach solution, with the residue obtained containing only traces of manganese. The findings of the present study can be applied to the recovery of manganese from LGMOs at an industrial scale owing to the good reactivity, efficiency, availability, and economic feasibility of banana peels. Furthermore, the SCM can be used to describe the leaching process, where the leaching rate is controlled by a surface chemical reaction mechanism. The apparent activation energy (40.19 kJ·mol−1) and positive values of ∆G# (105.152, 107.189, 109.226, and 111.263 kJ·mol−1) at various temperatures (333, 343, 353, and 363 K) demonstrate the requirement of an energy barrier for the successful extraction of manganese. The thermodynamic parameters (∆H# = 37.31 kJ·mol−1, ∆S# = −203.72 J∙K–1∙mol–1) associated with the activation indicated that the extraction of manganese follows as entropy-driven extraction mechanism.

Reference (35)



    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint