Zicheng Xin, Jiangshan Zhang, Kaixiang Peng, Junguo Zhang, Chunhui Zhang, Jun Wu, Bo Zhang,  and Qing Liu, Explainable machine learning model for predicting molten steel temperature in the LF refining process, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 31(2024), No. 12, pp. 2657-2669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-024-2950-4
Cite this article as:
Zicheng Xin, Jiangshan Zhang, Kaixiang Peng, Junguo Zhang, Chunhui Zhang, Jun Wu, Bo Zhang,  and Qing Liu, Explainable machine learning model for predicting molten steel temperature in the LF refining process, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 31(2024), No. 12, pp. 2657-2669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-024-2950-4
Research Article

Explainable machine learning model for predicting molten steel temperature in the LF refining process

+ Author Affiliations
  • Corresponding authors:

    Jiangshan Zhang    E-mail: qliu@ustb.edu.cn

    Qing Liu    E-mail: zjsustb@163.com

  • Received: 8 November 2023Revised: 15 May 2024Accepted: 3 June 2024Available online: 4 June 2024
  • Accurate prediction of molten steel temperature in the ladle furnace (LF) refining process has an important influence on the quality of molten steel and the control of steelmaking cost. Extensive research on establishing models to predict molten steel temperature has been conducted. However, most researchers focus solely on improving the accuracy of the model, neglecting its explainability. The present study aims to develop a high-precision and explainable model with improved reliability and transparency. The eXtreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) and light gradient boosting machine (LGBM) were utilized, along with bayesian optimization and grey wolf optimization (GWO), to establish the prediction model. Different performance evaluation metrics and graphical representations were applied to compare the optimal XGBoost and LGBM models obtained through varying hyperparameter optimization methods with the other models. The findings indicated that the GWO-LGBM model outperformed other methods in predicting molten steel temperature, with a high prediction accuracy of 89.35% within the error range of ±5°C. The model’s learning/decision process was revealed, and the influence degree of different variables on the molten steel temperature was clarified using the tree structure visualization and SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis. Consequently, the explainability of the optimal GWO-LGBM model was enhanced, providing reliable support for prediction results.
  • loading
  • Supplementary Information-s12613-024-2950-4.docx
  • [1]
    R.Y. Yin, A discussion on “smart” steel plant—View from physical system side, Iron Steel, 52(2017), No. 6, p. 1.
    [2]
    Z.C. Xin, J.S. Zhang, Y. Jin, J. Zheng, and Q. Liu, Predicting the alloying element yield in a ladle furnace using principal component analysis and deep neural network, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 30(2023), No. 2, p. 335. doi: 10.1007/s12613-021-2409-9
    [3]
    Q. Liu, X. Shao, J.P. Yang, and J.S. Zhang, Multiscale modeling and collaborative manufacturing for steelmaking plants, Chin. J. Eng., 43(2021), No. 12, p. 1698.
    [4]
    Z.C. Xin, J.S. Zhang, K.X. Peng, J.G. Zhang, C.H. Zhang, and Q. Liu, Modeling of LF refining process: A review, J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 31(2024), No. 2, p. 289. doi: 10.1007/s42243-023-01100-6
    [5]
    N.L. Samways and T.E. Dancy, Factors affecting temperature drop between tapping and teeming, JOM, 12(1960), No. 4, p. 331. doi: 10.1007/BF03377980
    [6]
    A. Zimmer, Á.N.C. Lima, R.M. Trommer, S.R. Bragança, and C.P. Bergmann, Heat transfer in steelmaking ladle, J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 15(2008), No. 3, p. 11. doi: 10.1016/S1006-706X(08)60117-X
    [7]
    Y.J. Wu, Z.H. Jiang, M.F. Jiang, W. Gong, and D.P. Zhan, Temperature prediction model of molten steel in LF, J. Iron Steel Res., 14(2002), p. 9.
    [8]
    P.S. Srinivas, A.K. Kothari, and A. Agrawal, Parameter estimation by inverse solution methodology using genetic algorithms for real time temperature prediction model of ladle furnace, ISIJ Int., 56(2016), No. 6, p. 977. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2015-712
    [9]
    A.N. Wang, H.X. Tian, Z.H. Jiang, D.P. Zhan, X.D. Yin, and Z.G. Ma, Temperature prediction of molten steel for LF based on information fusion technique, J. Iron Steel Res., 17(2005), No. 6, p. 71.
    [10]
    Z.C. Xin, J.S. Zhang, J.G. Zhang, J. Zheng, Y. Jin, and Q. Liu, Predicting temperature of molten steel in LF-refining process using IF–ZCA–DNN model, Metall. Mater. Trans. B, 54(2023), No. 3, p. 1181. doi: 10.1007/s11663-023-02753-0
    [11]
    W. Lv, Z.Z. Mao, P. Yuan, and M.X. Jia, Multi-kernel learnt partial linear regularization network and its application to predict the liquid steel temperature in ladle furnace, Knowl. Based Syst., 36(2012), p. 280. doi: 10.1016/j.knosys.2012.07.012
    [12]
    F. Yuan, A.J. Xu, and M.Q. Gu, Development of an improved CBR model for predicting steel temperature in ladle furnace refining, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 28(2021), No. 8, p. 1321. doi: 10.1007/s12613-020-2234-6
    [13]
    H.X. Tian, Y.D. Liu, K. Li, R.R. Yang, and B. Meng, A new AdaBoost.IR soft sensor method for robust operation optimization of ladle furnace refining, ISIJ Int., 57(2017), No. 5, p. 841. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2016-371
    [14]
    Z.C. Xin, J.S. Zhang, J. Zheng, Y. Jin, and Q. Liu, A hybrid modeling method based on expert control and deep neural network for temperature prediction of molten steel in LF, ISIJ Int., 62(2022), No. 3, p. 532. doi: 10.2355/isijinternational.ISIJINT-2021-251
    [15]
    Ü. Çamdali and M. Tunc, Energy and exergy analysis of a ladle furnace, Can. Metall. Q., 42(2003), p. 439. doi: 10.1179/cmq.2003.42.4.439
    [16]
    Z.Y. Tao, M.F. Jiang, and C.J. Liu, Prediction of molten steel end point temperature in LF based on modified artificial neural network, Spec. Steel, 27(2006), No. 6, p. 21.
    [17]
    G.Q. Fu, Q. Liu, Z. Wang, et al., Grey box model for predicting the LF end-point temperature of molten steel, J. Univ. Sci. Technol. Beijing, 35(2013), No. 7, p. 948.
    [18]
    L.L. Zou, J.S. Zhang, Y.S. Han, F.Z. Zeng, Q.H. Li, and Q. Liu, Internal crack prediction of continuous casting billet based on principal component analysis and deep neural network, Metals, 11(2021), No. 12, art. No. 1976. doi: 10.3390/met11121976
    [19]
    G. Xu, M. Li, Z.M. Lv, and J.W. Xu, Online intelligent product quality monitoring method based on machine learning, Chin. J. Eng., 44(2022), No. 4, p. 730.
    [20]
    X. Shao, Q. Liu, Z.C. Xin, J.S. Zhang, T. Zhou, and S.S. Li, Hybrid model for BOF oxygen blowing time prediction based on oxygen balance mechanism and deep neural network, Int. J. Miner. Metall. Mater., 31(2024), No. 1, p. 106. doi: 10.1007/s12613-023-2670-1
    [21]
    Y. Niu, Z.Q. Hong, Y.Q. Wang, and Y.C. Zhu, Machine learning-based beta transus temperature prediction for titanium alloys, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 23(2023), p. 515. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.019
    [22]
    T. Shafighfard, F. Bagherzadeh, R.A. Rizi, and D.Y. Yoo, Data-driven compressive strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete (SFRC) subjected to elevated temperatures using stacked machine learning algorithms, J. Mater. Res. Technol., 21(2022), p. 3777. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.10.153
    [23]
    P. Mahajan, S. Uddin, F. Hajati, and M.A. Moni, Ensemble learning for disease prediction: A review, Healthcare, 11(2023), No. 12, art. No. 1808.
    [24]
    H.Y. Li, X.J. Liu, X. Li, X.P. Bu, H.W. Li, and Q. Lyu, Causality analysis and prediction of blast furnace state based on convergence cross mapping, Ironmaking Steelmaking, 49(2022), No. 9, p. 875. doi: 10.1080/03019233.2022.2065447
    [25]
    Y.K. Kong and K. Kurumisawa, Application of machine learning in predicting workability for alkali-activated materials, Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 18(2023), art. No. e02173.
    [26]
    M. Pelikan, D.E. Goldberg, and E. Cantú-Paz, BOA: The Bayesian optimization algorithm, [in] Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, Orlando, 1999, p. 525.
    [27]
    H. Huang, J.N. Qiu, and K. Riedl, On the global convergence of particle swarm optimization methods, Appl. Math. Optim., 88(2023), No. 2, art. No. 30. doi: 10.1007/s00245-023-09983-3
    [28]
    J.H. Holland, Genetic algorithms, Sci. Am., 267(1992), No. 1, p. 66. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0792-66
    [29]
    S. Mirjalili, S.M. Mirjalili, and A. Lewis, Grey wolf optimizer, Adv. Eng. Software, 69(2014), p. 46. doi: 10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.12.007
    [30]
    R.F. Cui, H. Ma, C.P. Guo, H.Y. Li, and Z. Liu, Prediction of missile aerodynamic data based on gradient boosting under Bayesian hyperparametric optimization, Aeronaut. Sci. Technol., 34(2023), No. 7, p. 22.
    [31]
    B. Gong, Study of PLSR-BP model for stability assessment of loess slope based on particle swarm optimization, Sci. Rep., 11(2021), No. 1, art. No. 17888. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-97484-0
    [32]
    Y.B. He, H. Guo, B.Q. Zhang, Q. Zhu, H.M. Tang, and Y.H. Li, Prediction method of hot metal silicon content based on improved BP neural network, J. Iron. Steel. Res., 36(2024), No. 3, p. 309.
    [33]
    J. Zhou, Y.L. Zhang, C.Q. Li, et al., Enhancing the performance of tunnel water inflow prediction using Random Forest optimized by Grey Wolf Optimizer, Earth Sci. Inform., 16(2023), No. 3, p. 2405. doi: 10.1007/s12145-023-01042-3
    [34]
    M.T. Ribeiro, S. Singh, and C. Guestrin, “Why should I trust you?”: Explaining the predictions of any classifier, [in] Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, San Diego, 2016, p. 1135.
    [35]
    S.M. Lundberg and S.I. Lee, A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, [in] Proceedings of the 31st Conference and Workshop on Neural Information Processing Systems, California, 2017, p. 4765.
    [36]
    Y.L. Huang, X.L. Qin, Y.W. Chen, L.G. Zhang, and B. Yi, Interpretability analysis of sepsis prediction model using LIME, J. Comput. Appl., 41(2021), No. S1, p. 332.
    [37]
    N. Bar, T. Korem, O. Weissbrod, et al., A reference map of potential determinants for the human serum metabolome, Nature, 588(2020), No. 7836, p. 135. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2896-2
    [38]
    W. Liu, Z.X. Chen, Y. Hu, and J. Zhang, Forecasting pipeline safety and remaining life with machine learning methods and SHAP interaction values, Int. J. Press. Vessels Pip., 205(2023), art. No. 105000. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2023.105000
    [39]
    A. Homafar, H. Nasiri, and S.C. Chelgani, Modeling coking coal indexes by SHAP-XGBoost: Explainable artificial intelligence method, Fuel Commun., 13(2022), art. No. 100078. doi: 10.1016/j.jfueco.2022.100078
    [40]
    S.L. Ma, Theoretical analysis and calculation of LF fume parameters, Environ. Eng., 25(2007), No. 5, p. 44.
    [41]
    H.X. Tian, Z.Z. Mao, and A.N. Wang, Hybrid modeling for soft sensing of molten steel temperature in LF, J. Iron Steel Res. Int., 16(2009), No. 4, p. 1. doi: 10.1016/S1006-706X(09)60051-0
    [42]
    J. Li, J. Fu, P. Wang, Q.F. Bi, and C.G. Huang, Composition adjustment and temperature prediction of molten steel in LF, J. Iron Steel Res., 11(1999), No. 2, p. 6.
    [43]
    S.M. Malakouti, Babysitting hyperparameter optimization and 10-fold-cross-validation to enhance the performance of ML methods in predicting wind speed and energy generation, Intell. Syst. Appl., 19(2023), art. No. 200248. doi: 10.1016/j.iswa.2023.200248
    [44]
    K.E. Taylor, Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram, J. Geophys. Res., 106(2001), No. D7, p. 7183. doi: 10.1029/2000JD900719
    [45]
    S. Mangalathu, S.H. Hwang, and J.S. Jeon, Failure mode and effects analysis of RC members based on machine-learning-based SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) approach, Eng. Struct., 219(2020), art. No. 110927. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110927
    [46]
    B. Xi, E.M. Li, Y. Fissha, J. Zhou, and P. Segarra, LGBM-based modeling scenarios to compressive strength of recycled aggregate concrete with SHAP analysis, Mech. Adv. Mater. Struct., 31(2023), No. 23, p. 5999. doi: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2224782
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(10)  / Tables(5)

    Share Article

    Article Metrics

    Article Views(298) PDF Downloads(91) Cited by()
    Proportional views

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return